MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2078989237 · doi:10.1353/can.2013.0016

The Call to Arms: The 1812 Invasions of Upper Canada by Richard Feltoe (review)

2013· article· en· W2078989237 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Wesley B. Turner

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFrontierContext (archaeology)HistorySpanish Civil WarReading (process)GenealogyClassicsLawArchaeologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Call to Arms: The 1812 Invasions of Upper Canada by Richard Feltoe Wesley B. Turner The Call to Arms: The 1812 Invasions of Upper Canada. Richard Feltoe. Toronto: Dundurn, 2012. Pp. 160. $19.99 The writing of history is a work in progress, and this is particularly true of studies about the War of 1812, which author Richard Feltoe prefers to call “the North American War of 1812–1815.” As he explains in his introduction, Feltoe undertook this work, the first in a series of six planned “chronological parts,” after reading many published accounts of the war. To him the approach in those works was either too widespread or too microscopic and lacking in context. Consequently, he has undertaken to write a study “somewhere in the middle.” He decided to concentrate on the Niagara frontier, which saw more fighting than any other area of North America, a story untold “in recent publishing history.” His focus, he argues, is reinforced by the image on the front of the Upper Canada Preserved medal, which depicts the Niagara River, and facing across this “dividing line” are the national [End Page 145] symbols of the American eagle and the British lion alongside a beaver representing the Canadas. Three chapters out of seven, as well as a few pages in chapter 1, concentrate on the Niagara frontier. To explain what happened there requires discussing the causes of the war as well as preparations for it in both the United States and British North America. Feltoe emphasizes the American westward drive into Native lands, which not only produced frontier warfare but also aroused American ambition to drive the British out of North America altogether. The impetus to war was also moved, he believes, by American ambition to profit from control of the continent’s resources and the shipping trade with Europe. He describes clearly the serious divisions within the United States and the inadequacies of its military system to prosecute war effectively against the Canadas. All this context is found in standard historical accounts. In chapter 3, the author diverges from the Niagara region to look briefly at minor actions on the St Lawrence River, followed by detailed treatment of the capture of Fort Michilimackinac, battles around Detroit, and its surrender by General Hull. In the following chapter the author writes about skirmishing along the St Lawrence River, including the oddly named “Battle of Matilda.” He provides illustrations and maps for these battles, showing movements of units with times. The relevance of events in these two chapters to the situation on the Niagara frontier is suggested rather than explained. The book’s great strength is Feltoe’s detailed treatment of events: the gathering of American forces along the Niagara frontier, the Battle of Queenston Heights, and General Smyth’s later failed invasion attempts. His precise accounts could be very useful for re-enactors – of which Feltoe is one – and should appeal to readers interested in military history. The detail consists of quotations from contemporary documents, lists of forces on both sides and of casualties, illustrations, and maps of the river as well as of the battles. These last – eight for Queenston Heights and three for the November invasion attempt – present movements of units with arrows, letter and number designations, and times. In 160 pages, including notes, selected bibliography, and index, this is an impressive beginning for Feltoe’s proposed series. Feltoe offers a meticulous, detailed, and careful treatment of his subject, which, despite a few slips, is a valuable addition to the literature. He describes British North America as “Crown colonies,” a term that came into use later in the century and in the war period, if employed, would apply only to Gibraltar and Newfoundland. He refers to Brock and Sheaffe [End Page 146] as lieutenant governors. That office from 1805 to 1817 was held by Francis Gore, who maintained the title during the war years, despite his absence in England. Brock, Sheaffe, and their successors were designated “Senior Member of the [Executive] Council” and they were also referred to as “president of the council” or “administrator” of the province. The town adjacent to Fort George was known to Canadians and British as...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,673
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,650

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical Review→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→