MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2079086890 · doi:10.2138/rmg.2013.77.9

Carbon Mineralization: From Natural Analogues to Engineered Systems

2013· article· en· W2079086890 sur OpenAlex
Ian Power, Anna L. Harrison, Gregory M. Dipple, Sasha Wilson, P. B. Kelemen, Michael Hitch, Gordon Southam

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiquePaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésObservatoryColumbia universityGeological surveyLibrary scienceHistoryArt historyMedia studiesGeologySociologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Carbon sequestration research and technology is motivated by concerns that increasing atmospheric CO concentrations are causing changes to Earth's climate and ecosystems that have the potential to cause serious, negative impacts on human welfare (IPCC 2005, 2007). As a global society, we will need to greatly improve energy efficiency and conservation, and develop alternative and renewable energy sources, while implementing carbon sequestration strategies to stabilize the concentration of atmospheric CO . The carbon mineralization strategies reviewed in this chapter complement CO storage in subsurface pore space. This promising approach for sequestering CO is grounded in the fundamental processes that govern natural mineral dissolution and carbonate precipitation. Natural analogue sites allow for the study of the geochemical and biological transformation of CO at the field-scale; drawing our attention to potential reaction pathways that can be exploited and utilized, but also to the limitations that must be overcome in geoengineered and industrial systems designed to accelerate carbonation. Further study of natural analogues may yield a better understanding of the reaction pathways required for efficient carbonation, the long-term stability of carbonate minerals at Earth's surface, and the monitoring required for long-term storage. Enhanced weathering of natural minerals or alkaline wastes under near-surface conditions offers a low-energy means of sequestering CO. Although this method offers the ability to aid in remediating the atmosphere, its effectiveness remains untested at large-scales. Accelerated carbonation of alkaline wastes may offer a means of reducing net greenhouse gas emission at the industrial level, while providing a testing ground for more widespread implementation. Biologically mediated carbonate precipitation is an alternate, low-energy means of sequestering CO that could be incorporated into efforts to produce biofuels. In situ carbon mineralization of peridotite offers substantial capacity and relatively fast carbonation rates. Industrial reactors for ex situ carbonation are technologically feasible, yet the estimated costs exceed current carbon prices. Further research and development of process routes is therefore required. Industries that produce alkaline wastes may adopt these technologies as a means of reducing their carbon footprints, while helping to further develop these technological solutions. The largest scale geologic carbon capture and storage operations currently inject ~1-3 Mt CO/yr into subsurface pore space (Michael et al. 2009; Whittaker et al. 2011). Use of industrial wastes for carbonation may rival these rates. In the future, these two strategies may be roughly equivalent in rate and capacity: global implementation of accelerated waste carbonation could exceed the sequestration capacity of 700 CO injection sites. Use of a variety of industrial wastes in parallel could provide ~45% of a "stabilization wedge," and deliver significant offsets at the industry-specific level (Figs. 10 and 11). Implementation of accelerated waste carbonation technologies may allow establishment of viable ex situ technologies that could then be applied to larger scale carbonation of abundant, rock forming minerals, both ex situ and in situ. Although mafic and ultramafic deposits are present in sufficient quantity to completely offset anthropogenic CO emissions for more than 1000 years, large-scale deployment of ex situ carbonation would require new mining activities at a scale comparable to total existing global mining operations (Power et al. 2013b). In principle, enhanced weathering and/or in situ carbonation of natural deposits could comprise an entire "stabilization wedge," but these techniques are very much at the basic research stage. The capacity and rates of carbon mineralization are sufficient to offset significant portions of global greenhouse gas emissions. To realize this potential requires an interdisciplinary effort from fields ranging from the physical sciences to engineering to social sciences. Many of the strategies discussed in this chapter are technologically feasible at a level required for large-scale experimentation and even implementation at the industrial scale. In practice, a combination of ex situ carbonation of industrial waste and natural minerals, in situ carbonation of rock formations, and ongoing CO storage in subsurface pore space, could achieve a "stabilization wedge" (Fig. 11). However, financial incentives, either via a cap-and-trade mechanism or a carbon tax, are required to stimulate further innovation and research of CO sequestration technologies that will lead to significant CO sequestration via carbon mineralization or any other method proposed to date. Investigation of all of these techniques should proceed in parallel, followed by gradual adoption of a range of successful methods, using a variety of optimal strategies that depend on specific local conditions and opportunities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,192
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,927

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle