MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2079401338 · doi:10.2118/2009-182

Evidence That Naturally Occurring Inhibitors Affect the Low-Temperature Oxidation Kinetics of Heavy Oil

2009· article· en· W2079401338 sur OpenAlex
N. P. Freitag

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemistry
ThématiquePetroleum Processing and Analysis
Établissements canadiensSaskatchewan Research Council (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesPetroleum Technology Research Centre
Mots-clésCitationDownloadKineticsChemistryComputer scienceFraction (chemistry)Information retrievalLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebOrganic chemistryPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The so-called induction period, the time delay between the initial exposure to oxygen of an oil or oil fraction and the start of rapid oxidation, was examined experimentally for the saturates fraction separated from a Lloydminster heavy oil. The observed kinetics could be explained by assuming that the saturates contained a small amount of naturally occurring oxidation inhibitors, which repressed the oxidation rates by rapidly consuming an essential intermediate in the reaction chain, but which were also gradually consumed in the process. This observation explains some of the complexity that has been seen in the oxidation rates that control combustion front development during in-situ combustion, and provides some added direction in the development of a comprehensive reaction model for this process. Introduction For enhanced oil recovery of heavy oil by in-situ combustion to be viable, it is essential that a high-temperature combustion front be established and maintained(1). Unfortunately, the creation of a combustion front can be thwarted (or sometimes aided) by the reactions that occur at temperatures below those needed for combustion. This problem has stimulated interest among some oil producers for a prediction method that can define the conditions for stable field operations. Low-temperature oxidation (LTO) is chief among the troublesome reactions. During the initial ignition period of an in-situ combustion project, the temperature must pass through the low-temperature oxidation (LTO) region, and therefore the success of an ignition is strongly influenced by this group of reactions. Similarly, when a combustion front encounters conditions at which factors such as a low air flux or heat losses reduce the temperature so that high-temperature oxidation is weakened, the LTO rates may dictate whether or not a combustion front remains stable. LTO has been found to be complex, and efforts to model it(2,3) have needed much more than a single reaction with Arrhenius rate parameters. In addition, the behaviour of the saturates fraction of oils has been shown(3) to be starkly different from that of the other SARA fractions. One of the major differences between the oxidation of saturates and the other aromatic-type fractions is that the saturates, when separated from the other fractions, exhibit a prolonged period of apparent inactivity after which LTO becomes much more rapid. In the literature on the chemistry of air injection, this is normally called an "induction period". There are two commonly accepted explanations for an induction period. One explanation is that it reflects the time for some intermediate compound in an essential chain of reactions to build up to the concentration needed for it to affect oxidation rates significantly. The other explanation is that a period of low reaction rate will exist until certain compounds that act as scavengers of an essential free-radical intermediate are consumed by their action. The difference can be important. If the first explanation is true, then a new induction period will occur whenever oxygen supply is interrupted and the essential intermediate becomes consumed as it continues along its reaction path.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,808

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle