Regionalization and Global Governance: The Taming of Globalization? – Edited by A.F. Cooper, C.W. Hughes and P. De Lombaerde
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Regionalization and Global Governance: The Taming of Globalization? edited by A.F. Cooper, C.W. Hughes and P. De Lombaerde ( London : Routledge , 2007 , ISBN 9780415453776 ); xvi + 269 pp. , £22.99 pb . As indicated in the title, the overriding question in this book is whether regionalization can tame globalization and provide governance in the global system. Although this is not the first book dealing with this central question, this volume represents a very useful addition to the literature and is essential reading for both scholars and students interested in the complex relationship between global governance and regionalization. The book is a result of a joint conference held in October 2005, in which the three main institutions involved, the Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization (CSGR), University of Warwick, UK, the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), Waterloo, Canada and the United Nations University-Comparative Regional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS), Bruges, Belgium, share the challenge of editing. The introduction written by the three editors is followed by 12 chapters that are divided in four parts. Collectively, 17 scholars are involved in describing the theoretical debates, the economic dimensions, the security considerations and the governing structures pertaining to the relationship between global governance and regionalization. The book is rather even in content and quality for an edited volume and it reads well. However, the introduction and the first four theoretical chapters (Part I) are particularly clear and informative. These chapters do not only provide a succinct general picture and a point of departure for the substantive chapters; they are innovative because they direct the attention to topics largely neglected in the established regionalization and global governance literature (e.g. the role of civil society and social movements), and because they challenge established paradigms and understandings in an original manner (e.g. the ‘old’ versus ‘new’ regionalism divide, the split between the European integration theorists and the international relations/international political economy/comparative regionalism scholars). Most chapters connect well with these introductory theoretical debates. The exception here is the chapter on the regional multinationals and the myth of globalization, which although fascinating, does not fit well in tone and content with the rest of the book. The first sentence of the book warns the readers that ‘the relationship between global governance and regionalization is fraught with ambiguity’. This book justifies this warning by illustrating and discussing the various sources of this ambiguity, and facilitates dialogue and prepares the ground for further and more refined analyses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».