Examining working time arrangements using time use survey data
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper uses full-record time diary data from six studies conducted in four countries, Canada (1992), the Netherlands (1990 and1995), Norway (1980, 1990), and Sweden (1991), to analyse daily schedules of individual work time patterns.The work schedules are based on the combination of regular paid work, overtime work, second jobs, and any reported informal paid activity.We define work episodes as single occurrences of paid work activity separated by 60 or more minutes from any other paid work episodes.The reference work episode was the one that occurred during "core" hours, which were defined as 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. for Canada and Netherlands, and as 7:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. for Norway and Sweden.These "core" time definitions were based upon the frequencies of start and end-times of work episodes.Work episodes were calculated for all days, including weekend days.We identified seven theoretical work time arrangements possible during a day for each individual with reference to the core working hours.These classifications of work time arrangements extend from early morning to late night with three classifications being single arrangements and four being multiple and overlapping arrangements.Empirically these arrangements, in combination, generated 10 workday patterns for individuals.We found vast, though as yet statistically untested, differences in work time arrangements across countries and by sex.In general, men tended to be relatively evenly distributed over the work time arrangements defined for a typical day, while women tended to work a single episode during core hours only.2/3 of Canadian and Swedish men worked at least some time outside core hours, while nearly half of Dutch and Norwegian men only worked during the core period.Women in Sweden worked a wider range of hours than women in the other three countries.Where possible, this paper explores relations between other aspects of working arrangements and the timing of paid work episodes.We found a strong relationship between the scheduling and the duration of paid work.People who worked both pre-core to core and core to post-core episodes worked the longest hours, while people working post-core only or only working core to post-core episodes put in the fewest hours.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».