MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W208029733

Examining working time arrangements using time use survey data

2000· preprint· en· W208029733 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew S. Harvey, Kimberly Fisher, Jonathan Gershuny, Ather H. Akbari

Notice bibliographique

RevueEconstor (Econstor) · 2000
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineDecision Sciences
ThématiqueScheduling and Timetabling Solutions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesInternational Labour Organization
Mots-clésWorking timeTime-use surveyComputer scienceData scienceWork (physics)Engineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This paper uses full-record time diary data from six studies conducted in four countries, Canada (1992), the Netherlands (1990 and1995), Norway (1980, 1990), and Sweden (1991), to analyse daily schedules of individual work time patterns.The work schedules are based on the combination of regular paid work, overtime work, second jobs, and any reported informal paid activity.We define work episodes as single occurrences of paid work activity separated by 60 or more minutes from any other paid work episodes.The reference work episode was the one that occurred during "core" hours, which were defined as 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. for Canada and Netherlands, and as 7:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. for Norway and Sweden.These "core" time definitions were based upon the frequencies of start and end-times of work episodes.Work episodes were calculated for all days, including weekend days.We identified seven theoretical work time arrangements possible during a day for each individual with reference to the core working hours.These classifications of work time arrangements extend from early morning to late night with three classifications being single arrangements and four being multiple and overlapping arrangements.Empirically these arrangements, in combination, generated 10 workday patterns for individuals.We found vast, though as yet statistically untested, differences in work time arrangements across countries and by sex.In general, men tended to be relatively evenly distributed over the work time arrangements defined for a typical day, while women tended to work a single episode during core hours only.2/3 of Canadian and Swedish men worked at least some time outside core hours, while nearly half of Dutch and Norwegian men only worked during the core period.Women in Sweden worked a wider range of hours than women in the other three countries.Where possible, this paper explores relations between other aspects of working arrangements and the timing of paid work episodes.We found a strong relationship between the scheduling and the duration of paid work.People who worked both pre-core to core and core to post-core episodes worked the longest hours, while people working post-core only or only working core to post-core episodes put in the fewest hours.iii Non-Technical SummaryTime diary research collects detailed accounts of the activities in which people engage over the course of a day.This paper uses time diary data from six studies conducted in four countries, Canada (1992), the Netherlands (1990and 1995), Norway (1980 and 1990), and Sweden (1991), to find out how people schedule their paid work (including overtime, moonlighting, informal or casual work) over the course of the day.In particular, we wanted to find out how often people work outside of normal business hours, and how people working non-standard hours fit work into the rest of their day.We also wanted to find out how many work episodes people undertook in a day.We defined a work episode as a period which starts as people begin to work having done other activities for at least an hour before working and ending when people again do other activities for at least an hour following doing paid work.While most people overall worked during standard business hours, work outside these hours was frequent in all four countries.While women in Sweden worked during a wider range of times of day than women in Canada, the Netherlands and Norway, women on the whole were more likely to only work during core business hours and to have only one episode of work in a day.Men, in contrast, were more evenly distributed across various working time arrangements.Nearly half of men in the Netherlands and Norway did some work outside regular business hours, and two-thirds of men in Canada and Sweden worked at least partly outside these hours.We identified ten main patterns of scheduling work throughout the day.These patterns are related to the total hours people worked.People who started work before standard hours, worked at least some standard hours and also worked some hours after the core period spent more of their day working than other groups of employed people.People who only worked after core hours or who started work during core hours and continued working after core hours worked the fewest hours.Table 2 -The Definitions of Work Time Patterns Start of Episode End of Episode Value Hypercode Preonly before core Before core 1 10000 Coreonly core core 1 1000 Postonly after core after core 1 100 Preendcore before core core 1 10 Corepost core after core 1 1 All present 11111

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,150
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,298

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0060,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,410
Tête enseignante GPT0,390
Écart entre enseignants0,020 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEconstor (Econstor)Même sujetScheduling and Timetabling SolutionsTravaux en français237 207