MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2081381374 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3113.2008.00466.x

Urban Ants of North America and Europe: Identification, Biology, and Management ‐ Edited by John Klotz, Laurel Hansen, Reiner Pospischil and Michael Rust

2009· article· en· W2081381374 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrea Lucky

Notice bibliographique

RevueSystematic Entomology · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyIdentification (biology)Ecology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Urban ants of North America and Europe: identification, biology, and management by John Klotz, Laurel Hansen, Reiner Pospischil and Michael Rust. 2008. Comstock Publishing Associates (A division of Cornell University Press), Ithaca and London. ISBN 978-0-8014-7473. $27.95. Ants rank among the most economically important pests in the United States and Europe, yet identification of even common species can prove difficult for non-specialists. This is a problem for anyone involved in the control of established ant pests and also regarding the prevention of the spread of invasive ants, which pose a serious threat worldwide. Excellent identification materials do exist for specific ant taxa (e.g. Hansen & Klotz’s (2005)Carpenter Ants of the United States and Canada), but many guides are limited regionally (University of California IPM: Online Key to Identifying Common Household Ants of California) or outdated taxonomically (Smith’s (1965)House Infesting Ants of the Eastern United States). Now a new publication provides the much needed link bridging art taxonomy and applied entomology. Urban Ants of North America and Europe combines identification tools, natural history description and management recommendations in a slim, easy-to-use volume, making it an extremely useful resource for pest-management personnel, quarantine officials, ecologists and natural historians interested in the ants that live in urban environments. The authors state their intent clearly: to improve pest-control practices by tailoring management to species-specific biology. Throughout the book they emphasize that the most effective and least toxic control measures take advantage of ant nesting and foraging behaviours, which are described in detail. Lest the reader be tempted to dismiss Urban Ants as a technician’s guide to exterminating ants, let me emphasize that this is not a book about eradicating pests, but rather is more akin to a field guide to ants that thrive in human-altered landscapes. The book’s organization is taxonomic (by subfamily) rather than by pest status. Following a brief introduction to ant biology, the book is dedicated largely to keys to genera and species, with descriptions of the biology of each. The final two chapters discuss medical implications and management strategies related to pest ant infestations. The taxonomy-focused format requires that the reader be comfortable with dichotomous keys, as species identifications often require working through three separate keys: first to subfamily, then to genus, and finally to species. Fortunately, the short and unambiguous keys feature couplets that are illustrated clearly with simple line drawings. The book’s ability to summarize an enormous amount of information and present it with ease and clarity far outshines the few oversights that caught my attention. For example, readers may be confused by repeated references to the now defunct ‘Homoptera’ and by the use of an obsolete, morphologically incorrect term for the propodeum (the ‘epinotum’). There are two aspects of Urban Ants that seem not to have taken advantage of the tremendous technological progress that both taxonomy and the publishing industry have experienced in the past few decades. The most unsatisfactory is the paucity of quality images accompanying the text. Beyond four colour plates at the front of the book, all the photographs in the text are reproduced in grainy black and white. Three genera (Brachymyrmex, Dorymyrmex and Forelius) are not illustrated in photos or even by a line drawing. The second surprising omission is the lack of reference to the many new and useful ant-related resources on the web. Users of Urban Ants will probably want to complement the information in the book with high-resolution colour images, of which the web offers an abundance. Among the best sites is Antweb (www.antweb.org), the California Academy of Sciences’ online repository of information about ants, and the premier site for high-resolution colour images of identified specimens, as well as distribution maps. Another outstanding online reference tool is the Pacific Invasive Ants Key, produced by Eli Sarnat in association with Biosecurity New Zealand and USDA/APHIS (www.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/PIAkey). This richly illustrated and user-friendly site offers photographs, line drawings, comparison charts, video and natural history information to users wishing to identify invasive ants in the Pacific region (many species overlap with North America and Europe). All in all, Urban Ants is an excellent example of taxonomy being distilled and delivered to a targeted user group. In producing a volume that focuses on the identification and control of the most commonly encountered and economically important ants in the United States and Europe, the authors have created a tool that fills a major gap in the resources available for the monitoring and control of ant pests on both the local and the global scale.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,092

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0280,017

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSystematic EntomologyMême sujetInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorTravaux en français237 207