Examining Task Oriented and Relations Oriented Team Diversity–An Analytic Review of the Banking Industry
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In today’s competitive business environment, organizations are compelled to stay on their toes at every second of their time to satisfy customers, solve economical and political problems, be cost efficient and innovative and establish a market value and name for itself. Tackling all these problems and hurdles and yet be innovative and creative cannot be managed by individuals alone. Hence, most organizations today have made use of teams, a group of people who work together towards a shared organizational goal. In teams, people from various backgrounds and expertise come together to give their opinion about a certain project so that all perspectives are kept in mind and collaborated before any decision is made. (O'Reilly et al., 1989).Since teams in organizations are made up of a diverse group of people hence there is always a possibility that they will not be able to work together. Banking Industry in Pakistan over the years has increased their focus on team work due to its challenging nature and ever changing demand for innovativeness and competitiveness. This study attempts to investigate the effects of task oriented and relation oriented diversity on team performance in the banking industry. Task oriented diversity involved factors like education, function and organizational tenure while Relation oriented diversity involved factors such as age, gender and ethnicity. The impact on team performance has been measured in terms of team members’ opinion, team leader/DOH opinion and their satisfaction levels. The study has explored how task oriented and relation oriented diversity influences the team performance with respect to three contextual factors namely: Occupational Demography (majority dominated vs balanced), Industry Setting (service industry in particular banking industry) and Team Tenure (short term vs long term). The research findings revealed that the effects of relations –oriented and task oriented diversity on performance was significantly different with respect to contextual moderators and they offer new possibilities for enhancing team diversity outcomes. Therefore based on the study conclusions it is recommended that organizational practices especially HR policies and practices should consider the categorization and elaboration effects of task and relations oriented diversity in service industry. Similarly team tenure is also an important contextual moderator and diversity dynamics should be carefully understood for effective team outcomes especially in long term teams. Other industry level characteristics that have been ignored in earlier team diversity research should be examined since they offer new possibilities for enhancing team diversity outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».