‘Call Me Hank’: A Stó:lõ Man’s Reflections on Logging, Living, and Growing Old (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: ‘Call Me Hank’: A Stó:lõ Man’s Reflections on Logging, Living, and Growing Old Andrew Parnaby ‘Call Me Hank’: A Stó:lõ Man’s Reflections on Logging, Living, and Growing Old. Henry Pennier. Edited by Keith Thor CarlsonKristina Fagan. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006. Pp. 144, $63.00 cloth, $26.95 paper Near the end of his autobiography, Henry ‘Hank’ Pennier addresses an issue directly, which, until that point in the book, he had touched on only sporadically. ‘What’s it like being a half breed?’ he asks. ‘It hasn’t been easy,’ is his reply. Hank was born in 1904; both his father, George Pennier Junior, who died just months before Hank was born, and his mother, Alice Davis, were of mixed European and Stó:lõ ancestry. The youngest of eight children, Hank lived most of his life in British Columbia’s central Fraser Valley where he was raised by Stó:lõ people in a largely Stó:lõ environment. Despite this family history–his mother’s second husband was a Stó:lõ chief named August Billy–he was considered a ‘non-Native’ by the Canadian government. And therein, as this slim readable volume suggests, lies one of the defining features of this man’s life. ‘And all of us [in my family] are half breeds,’ Hank observes in the book’s preface. ‘Not white men and not Indian yet we look Indian and everybody but Indians takes us for Indian. It has been a complicated world and in some ways it still is I guess. And the damn government hasn’t helped any’ (4). Written in a punchy, anecdotal style, Hank’s autobiography explores the personal, social, and political complexities of being a ‘half-breed,’ an elastic racial categorization that brought with it dramatically different rights, opportunities, limitations, and dangers, depending on the context. ‘As we were half breeds and we could not live on the reservation, we were supposed to be white and we came under the white man’s status,’ Hank remarks in a subversively funny anecdote about going to residential school. ‘But the priests were very kind and they made an exception in our case’ (9–10). Equally influential in Hank’s life was the time he spent working as a logger–a job he started at seventeen years of age and left when he was fifty-five, after accumulated work-related injuries forced him to hang up his caulk boots. ‘You name it and I done it,’ Hank concludes in his chapter ‘I Remember My 1940s and 1950s Days.’ ‘And as I think about it now if I was the same age again and you gave me a choice of what I wanted to work at the rest of my life I think I would still want to be a logger’ (58). During his labouring life, Hank supplemented the modest income he derived from logging by hunting, fishing, and working in the hops and strawberry fields of the Pacific Northwest. Thus, across five chapters, stories about ‘hoboes,’ ‘highballers,’ ‘old Swedes,’ [End Page 609] ‘Mexican strawberry pickers,’ and ‘hunch backed cocky little whistle punks’ share space with tales about ‘tough braves’ and ‘Indian trappers’–a juxtaposition that effectively brings labour history and Aboriginal history together. For Hank, the link between being a logger and being half-breed was a deeply personal one, for the status, identity, independence, and sense of masculine accomplishment derived from being in the woods helped him neutralize the negative implications of being too Indian for some and not Indian enough for others. ‘Way back in the bush among the big trees doing a man’s work, I wasn’t a half breed, I was just good old Hank,’ the author writes. ‘Outside of my work I could not join white society, socially’ (86–7). Originally published as Chiefly Indian: The Warm and Witty Story of a British Columbia Half Breed Logger, the new edition is generously supported by archival and personal photographs, a glossary of logging terms, and a map; a cogent introduction, written by Keith Thor Carlson and Kristina Fagan, effectively contextualizes the book. Reflective, humane, and funny in equal measure, ‘Call Me Hank’ could easily be...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».