MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2082254164 · doi:10.1353/ecf.0.0117

Swift’s Travels: Eighteenth-Century British Satire and its Legacy (review)

2009· article· en· W2082254164 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Trevor Ross

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical and Literary Analyses
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSwiftHonourPoetryArt historyArtLiteratureAnecdoteHistoryClassicsArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Swift’s Travels: Eighteenth-Century British Satire and its Legacy Trevor Ross (bio) Nicholas Hudson and Aaron Santesso, eds. Swift’s Travels: Eighteenth-Century British Satire and its Legacy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. US$99. xiv+304pp. ISBN 978-0-521-87955-2. The title of this collection may give an inexact impression of its contents. Only one of sixteen contributors deals extensively with Swift’s Travels; his poetry receives rather more attention. Only one, Marjorie Perloff, considers Swift’s legacy understood as an acknowledged influence on a later author’s work—Beckett’s, in this case—and hers is the only essay to treat satire’s legacy beyond the early nineteenth century. Several contributors are concerned not with Swift’s legacy but with his literary inheritance, from his debt to More to his contempt for Dryden. Finally, the collection is a festschrift in all but name for Claude Rawson, the pre-eminent Swift scholar of the past half-century, and so it is as much about Rawson’s legacy as Swift’s. Virtually all of the contributors, which include many of Rawson’s most distinguished peers, open their essays by citing or quoting approvingly from his work. And if none of the essays is as ample or forceful as Rawson’s typically are, the authors honour his influence by replicating many of his strengths and preoccupations as a critic: his range and breadth of comparison, his alertness to tonal inflections and rhetorical stress-points, his longstanding emphasis on the unsettling and often rebarbative nature of eighteenth-century satire, and occasionally his penchant for pluralized abstractions (“human potentials,” “moral intensities,” “paradoxical intimacies”). The essays also variously follow what the volume’s editors call the “methodologies of Rawson’s writing,” in particular his mode of richly contextualized close reading (2). The history of ideas supports extended analyses by Jonathan Lamb on Hobbesian fantasies of authority in A Tale of a Tub, Barbara Benedict on the anti-empirical representation of material objects in Swift’s poetry, and Nicholas Hudson on Pope’s artful negotiation of the barriers of social class. The modulations of genre are explored in essays by David Rosen and Aaron Santesso on the decay of allegorical conceptions of society from Utopia to Gulliver, Ian Higgins on how Swift’s satire draws on an older tradition of extremist polemics in English political pamphlets, Thomas Keymer on how Fielding’s fiction similarly appropriates and modifies the aggressive humour of popular jestbooks, and Peter Sabor on how Austen’s mocking annotations to Goldsmith’s History of England are an implicit rebuke of the positivistic assumption that historical narratives can and must present impartial accounts of national events. Publishing history is mined by Howard Erskine-Hill for evidence of Swift’s self-censoring and defeatism in “Verses on the Death of Dr. Swift,” and by James McLaverty on how in their later satires Swift grew more cautious as Pope became less so about naming names. In comparative [End Page 382] essays, Stephen Zwicker takes Swift to task for being “utterly unresponsive” to Dryden’s complex uses of irony (86), Perloff sees Beckett’s fiction as sharing the intense negativity of Swift’s satire while producing irony that is more uncertain and “free-floating” (281), and, in an especially Rawsonlike close reading of Austen’s “voices,” Jenny Davidson shows how the novelist followed Swift in experimenting with first-person narration to create complicated ironic effects. Also Rawsonian in their comparative reach are two surveys of literary and visual motifs: Harold Love on satiric representations of English spas or “wells,” and Ronald Paulson on the parodying of the Eucharist through images of gaping mouths in works by Hogarth, Goya, and Domenico Tiepolo. Rawson has most significantly contributed to our understanding of Swift’s writings through his sensitive examinations of how their satiric energies emanate from feelings of alienation that are at once strenuously disguised and violently ambivalent. Two standout essays in the collection extend this idea in relation to Swift’s later work. Pat Rogers notes how, unable to reconcile himself to a life of exile, Swift continued to set much of his poetry in London as if he...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,588
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetHistorical and Literary AnalysesTravaux en français237 207