MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2082424183 · doi:10.1353/ari.2014.0027

The Case of Mistress Mary Hampson: Her Story of Marital Abuse and Defiance in Seventeenth-Century England by Jessica L. Malay (review)

2014· article· en· W2082424183 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAriel · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMalayPunctuationHistoryClassicsPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Case of Mistress Mary Hampson: Her Story of Marital Abuse and Defiance in Seventeenth-Century England by Jessica L. Malay Kirsten Inglis (bio) Jessica L. Malay. The Case of Mistress Mary Hampson: Her Story of Marital Abuse and Defiance in Seventeenth-Century England. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2014. Pp. xv, 158. US$65.00/$19.95. Jessica Malay’s most recent work comprises an edition of A Plain and Compendious Relation of the Case of Mrs. Mary Hampson (London, 1684). The extremely rare seventeenth-century pamphlet—Malay records only three surviving copies—is a first-person account by Mary Hampson (née Wingfield, 1639–98) of her troubled and often violent marriage to lawyer Robert Hampson (1627–88). It is unique in accounts of early modern domestic violence. Malay finds that although marital dispute publications were not uncommon in this period, they usually took the form of single-sheet broadsides (18–19), making Hampson’s “fully developed autobiographical narrative” something of an anomaly (19). Adding to its interest are hundreds of surviving documents in court and parish archives that detail the involvement of the church, community, and legal system in the Hampsons’ marital problems. Malay employs these documents to contextualize the pamphlet [End Page 173] in the three critical chapters that follow her edition. She finds record of the involvement of over 170 individuals (family, friends, and court and church officials) in the course of the Hampson marriage (11). The edition, which preserves original spelling but modernizes punctuation and capitalization, is sensibly organized, with introductory and supplementary material prefacing and Malay’s critical discussion and conclusion following it. Malay’s informative endnotes make the volume accessible to undergraduate readers, and the book would make an excellent addition to a syllabus on women’s writing in the period. Malay’s inclusion of supplementary material at the outset of the book is extremely helpful; these materials include a chronology of Mary Hampson’s life and genealogies of the Wingfield and Hampson families (xiii–xvii). The introduction provides context for the legal and social framework governing marriage during the seventeenth century, with particular focus on women’s rights and participation within the legal system. Though brief, the introduction is comprehensive, focuses on marriage as a legal institution, and contrasts the English system of “coverture,” under which “the wife was covered or subsumed within the legal identity of her husband,” with continental legal models (4). Malay characterizes the English system of coverture as paradoxical in that it was a “social mechanism . . . designed to encourage marital harmony” that nevertheless caused marital conflict and led to serious personal suffering for women (4). Malay’s introduction frequently refers to contemporary examples of marital abuse, both physical and psychological, including the famous example of Anne Clifford’s imprisonment and financial coercion (6–7). Malay also provides an interesting discussion of the means through which a family might attempt to reduce a woman’s vulnerability in marriage through a trust, settlement, jointure, or other contracted financial arrangement before the marriage commenced (7–8). The introduction is slightly narrow in scope; it concentrates on the legal framework of marriage and a preliminary summary of the contents of the pamphlet. Malay’s work on early modern autobiography and, more recently, participation in a Leverhulme Trust project concerning Anne Clifford’s Great Books might lead the reader to expect a fuller discussion of the implications of Mary Hampson’s pamphlet as autobiography (a term Malay uses repeatedly) or the issue of how early modern autobiography fashioned identity. That said, the focus of this book primarily concerns the legal and social structures surrounding the institution of marriage, and indeed Malay’s conclusion situates Hampson’s pamphlet within the larger early modern discourse surrounding unhappy marriage, specifically through reference to John Milton’s divorce tracts and his belief in the necessity for recourse to legal separation [End Page 174] and remarriage in the event that a couple found “themselves in a disastrous and destructive marriage” (Malay 118). It would not be hyperbolic to describe the Hampson marriage as “disastrous and destructive”; Mary Hampson recounts that her husband, after encountering personal financial ruin, forced her to sell her jointure (the only financial safety...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,830
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,335

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,192
Écart entre enseignants0,183 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle