MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2082513394 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0524

Take Comfort: The Career of Charles Comfort/La carrière de Charles Comfort (review)

2009· article· en· W2082513394 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sarah Stanners

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShort Stories in Global Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionArt historyHistoryPerformance artVisual artsArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Take Comfort: The Career of Charles Comfort/La carrière de Charles Comfort Sarah Stanners (bio) Mary Jo Hughes et al. Take Comfort: The Career of Charles Comfort/La carrière de Charles Comfort. Winnipeg Art Gallery. 160. $39.95 Charles Comfort (1900–94) recently took the spotlight in a retrospective exhibition organized by Mary Jo Hughes for the Winnipeg Art Gallery and a subsequent nationwide tour. An accompanying book, titled Take Comfort: The Career of Charles Comfort, catalogues ninety-six artworks and is authored by Hughes, along with four contributing authors, Rosemarie L. Tovell, Rosemary Donegan, Anna Hudson, and Laura Brandon. Published in both English and French, Take Comfort also includes an interactive cd-rom. The cd-rom takes an archival document as its starting point – a 1930s guestbook from the Comfort home in Toronto – and relays a wealth of biographical and anecdotal knowledge via hotspots on the many signatures and illustrations, which can be explored page by page. Although Comfort occupies a virtual no man’s land in popular attention between the Group of Seven and the advancements in abstraction after [End Page 420] mid-century, he is, in fact, so much a part of Canadian art history, both as an artist and as an administrator, that this monograph serves, in many ways, to recover the recognition of the artist, who had been esteemed among his peers. Despite Hughes’s call for more attention to be paid to Comfort, the largely biographical approach and reportorial tone of her introductory essay may do little to pique the interest of a newcomer to his work. This first essay of five does, however, do a thorough job of tracing the artist’s career. Tovell’s contribution also traces Comfort’s development but, more specifically, in watercolours from his early days in Winnipeg to his establishment in Toronto. A formal analysis takes priority, with a satisfying account of the influence of W.J. Phillips on the artist. Hughes is apt to point out that ‘condescension toward commercial art’ has wrongfully stunted the growth of discourse on Comfort, but as this publication proves, the artist’s commercial activities were vital to his overall aesthetic development, not to mention fellowship. Donegan’s essay on Comfort’s murals makes headway in this area, showing that the artist’s ability to satisfy a client’s vision made him quite successful with mural commissions. How successfully, or even appropriately, these murals speak to today’s viewers is another matter, which Donegan hastily skims over. It is hoped, as Hughes promises, that this study is just the beginning of greater explorations into Comfort’s career. An engaging critical tone is struck with the contribution of Hudson on Comfort. Hudson’s essay, ‘Charles Comfort’s Moment in the Relationship of Art and Life, 1935–1945,’ takes an interdisciplinary approach to the analysis of Comfort’s handling of art and life in his work. With references to Virginia Woolf and Aldous Huxley, among others, Hudson’s approach to Comfort’s ‘imagined international cultural community’ incites interest in the artist’s intellectual profile and should make any reader want to open more doors on the artist. Hudson’s critical analysis pays due respect to the artist while pointing out problematic issues. On Comfort’s adoption of symbols in his work, Hudson bravely states, ‘He was playing with fire; he risked cliché.’ Thinking about the reception of art, Brandon’s essay on Comfort’s war art, and the Hitler Line (1944/1970) in particular, asks, ‘[I]s the perceived veracity of an image predicated on observation or expectation?’ Brandon’s contribution is a necessary one – tackling what Comfort considered his best work of art. Anyone interested in war art should place this essay on his or her reading list. Young Canadian (1932) is another one of Comfort’s most striking paintings, and its present location at Hart House was just one of the traditional haunts of Canadian art that was notably shaped by taking Comfort, so to speak. As a member of the Toronto Arts & Letters Club, the Canadian Group of Painters, the Royal Canadian Academy, the Canadian Society of Painters in Watercolours, and as director of the National Gallery...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,036
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,122

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0360,013

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,202
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetShort Stories in Global LiteratureTravaux en français237 207