Architecture without Blueprints
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXTFew people could have imagined, even in 1990, the radically different circumstances that would face the world community at the turn of the century; particularly those in the developing world as well as those in richer countries engaged in the development enterprise. Against the promise of a peace dividend at the end of the Cold War, there have been global financial crises, massive crimes against humanity, episodes of genocide and brutal civil conflict, and a devastating pandemic (HIV/AIDS) that has hollowed out much of the working population in Africa and elsewhere. There have been recurring droughts and famine, due both to climate change and to human folly or malevolence. Most recently, the US-led wars against terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq portend a massive reallocation of world resources to security and defence.At the same time, regions of prosperity and greater well-being have surfaced in the developing world, most recently in the two Asian giants, China and India, home to 40 per cent of humankind. Industrial development, powered by modern technology and international commerce, is transforming many parts of Asia and Latin America, providing people with employment and income opportunities their parents only dreamed about. In Africa, the New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD) and the formation of the African Union signal a new mood among African leaders to grapple collectively with the issues of development, governance and conflict.In this rapidly changing environment, Canada's role is bound to be different from the one it enjoyed until 1990. It is also true, however, that during the decade of the 1990s, Canada deliberately chose to scale down its role and commitments on the world stage because of its fiscal crisis. Canada was not unique, however, in facing a fiscal crisis, though it arguably took more severe measures than many of its peers in the industrial world, particularly the Nordic countries and the Netherlands, which sustained their high levels of support for foreign aid despite similar fiscal pressures. Moreover, Canada's aid program took a disproportionate share of the cuts in federal funding as part of its deficit-reduction initiatives.(1)By the end of the decade, the fiscal deficit was clearly vanquished and many Canadians called upon their country to recover some of the ground it had ceded.(2) It is not possible, though, to regain the status quo ante because the world is a very different place, and Canada's new prime minister must make choices that are attuned to it and to its likely future course.Our paper is organized as follows. This section describes the key elements of the new context in which development must take place in the years ahead. The following section sets out the key challenges and opportunities that face leaders, including Canada's new prime minister, as they contemplate the reshaping of development policy. The final section sets out an agenda for the new prime minister in the new context, taking advantage of Canada's key strengths.There are two aspects of the current global context particularly worth noting. First, the picture is not all bad. Arguably, an overall assessment might be that the developing world is a better place today for most of its people than it was half a century ago. Second, the relations between rich and poor countries are considerably more complex. The ubiquitous forces of globalization have made developing countries part of a system in which foreign aid is increasingly insignificant relative to other linkages with the industrial world--trade, finance, migration and technology. As a result, thinking about development, and about development policy, has shifted substantially in recent years.Good as well as badOver the last decade, a considerable amount of bad news has emanated from the developing world, disseminated by the media, ever more able to transmit instantaneously and in graphic detail, accounts of tragedies from the remotest corners of the globe. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,012 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,130 | 0,066 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».