Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Emile Durkheim: Sociologist of Modernity William Ramp Mustafa Emirbayer , ed. Emile Durkheim: Sociologist of Modernity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003, 306 pp. This book, the second volume in Blackwell's Modernity and Society series, is composed of selections from the work of Durkheim, organized thematically and paired with selections from a wide range of more contemporary authors chosen [End Page 373] for the ways in which they extend, respond to or throw new light on Durkheim's contribution to the development of contemporary sociological thought. The selections are chosen to form an extended conversation on central theoretical debates and key topics in sociological inquiry. The general emphasis of the book, in keeping with others in the series, is on an understanding of the topography, institutional order and morality of modern societies. Specific topics include social structure and collective consciousness; culture and symbolic classification; collective emotions and ritual process; individual and collective agency; the modern state and economy; occupational groups, family and education, and a magnificent final section on individuality and autonomy. Selections are taken from a wide range of Durkheim's oeuvre, moving beyond the usually-mined sources to include selections from The Evolution of Educational Thought, Socialism, and essays on the dualism of human nature, moral facts, individualism, penal evolution and — delightfully! — sex education. A wide range of subsequent luminaries are brought into dialogue with Durkheim, including but not limited to Pierre Bourdieu, Marc Bloch, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Mary Douglas, Kai Erikson, Michel Foucault, Victor Turner, Randall Collins, Erving Goffman, Jeffrey Alexander, Talcott Parsons, bell hooks, and Antonio Gramsci. The selections are bracketed by Emirbayer's opening discussion of Durkheim as a "sociologist of modernity" and by a concluding section on Durkheim's "methodological manifesto." The selections are necessarily short, but are well-chosen and read without too much choppiness or fragmentation. The editor's hand is firm but unobtrusive. Emirbayer's purpose is to present a "useful Durkheim" demonstrating both the "expansiveness" and "coherence" of his work, and highlighting some of its key contributions to contemporary sociology, including some which have suffered a relative neglect. Emirbayer organizes these contributions into two broad thematic groups: one concerned with questions of structure and agency, and another with institutions and institutional sectors. With regard to the first, Emirbayer stresses Durkheim's integrative approach to social structure and culture: cultural analyses of symbolic polarities are framed in relation to specific elements of social organization and differentiation. Emirbayer makes the important point that Durkheim never separated emotion and reason (as he is often accused of doing), regarding emotions as transpersonal and relationally grounded: for example, he was profoundly interested in patterns of emotional commitment animating such rationalized social forms as the Jesuit order. Similarly, Emirbayer notes that Durkheim's later emphasis on collective effervescence reveals an interest in the creative, dynamic and agentic aspects of revolution, conflict and contestation. Durkheim's institutional sociology suffered because of the relatively late publication of the lectures entitled Professional Ethics and Civic Morals, delaying recognition of the breadth of his interest in the structure and practices [End Page 374] of civil society; the "intermediate" domains of families, education corporations and professions. Then and now, Durkheim poses an alternative to political sociologies trading on a simple state/economy duality, and Foucault arguably owes him much in this light. Durkheim saw democratic societies as characterized by a productive (and historically unstable) tension between state agencies, individuals and intermediary institutions, and he developed sustained critiques of both conservative traditionalism and revolutionary socialism. Nonetheless, Durkheim offered a trenchant analysis of class conflict as a form of moral conflict, and of industrial capitalism as a transitional social form. The format of this book lends itself to use in undergraduate and graduate courses in sociological theory, the sociology of modernity, and institutional or cultural sociology. Had a lesser editor been in charge, it could easily have failed to inspire. But in Emirbayer's capable hands, this book emerges both as an excellent course text and as a significant contribution to Durkheim scholarship in its own right. Emirbayer's own innovative reworking of the pragmatist tradition and network theory have helped re-invigorate discussions of the intersection of culture and action...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».