SS: Canadian: Atlantic Development: The Value of Wellness
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Description of the Proposed Paper: The value of wellness paper is a comprehensive research review that proposes a conceptual model of the costs associated with high and low risk employees on an annual and career model. This model accurately addresses the variables specific to the oil and gas industry including the internal and external factors which must be addressed by the organization prior to engaging in wellness activities. This paper accurately portrays the specific costs by division as well as highlights the effect of wellness on safety as it relates to health as well as regulatory burden and license to operate. Application: This conceptual model provides the audience with the accurate costs, factors and concerns associated with wellness initiatives in remote environments. Several factors such as senior managements role, medical costs, replacement workers and re-training are relayed to the audience encompassing the full scope of wellness risk as it exists in the offshore. Results, Observations, and Conclusions: The value of wellness paper quantifies that a high risk employee can cost a company $125,000 per year if encompassing all high risk factors and up to 2.65 million dollars over the course of a career. This paper concludes that by adopting a wellness culture and controlling for wellness risk the organization can avoid serious costs and gain intangible advantages in regulatory burden, license to operate and brand equity and company loyalty. Significance of Subject Matter: Wellness may be a substantial contributer to both HSE and value to an organization. Companies controlling for wellness risk with a comprehensive wellness program will control costs, operational issues such as safety and license to operate as well as retain and maintain employees in a competitive aging job market. Introduction Organizations frequently ask wellness professionals specific questions around the cost of wellness. How much does it cost to run a ‘best practice’ wellness program, how much should our cost be relative to our risk in an approach to employee's wellness and are our current wellness arrangements cost-effective? The reason for focusing on cost is that financial directors, board members and human resources directors have all identified cost minimisation as a critical element in ensuring an efficient and effective approach to an employee's wellness as part of a wider human resources and operational strategy. The following document demonstrates that examining the cost of wellness is just one part of the equation. Organizations also have to examine the value a wellness program provides.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,025 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».