MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2083401267 · doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2012

<i>Proceedings B:</i> welcoming outstanding research of broad interest in all aspects of organismal biology

2011· editorial· en· W2083401267 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. P. Hassell

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2011
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyEngineering ethicsEnvironmental ethicsEngineeringPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

You have accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Hassell Michael P. 2012Proceedings B: welcoming outstanding research of broad interest in all aspects of organismal biologyProc. R. Soc. B.2791–2http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.2012SectionYou have accessEditorialProceedings B: welcoming outstanding research of broad interest in all aspects of organismal biology Editor-in-Chief Michael P. Hassell Michael P. Hassell Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Editor-in-Chief Michael P. Hassell Michael P. Hassell Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Published:19 October 2011https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.2012Time is flying at Proceedings B, at least for me, having now come to the end of my third year as editor-in-chief. Although the day-to-day procedures are now familiar, the challenges remain much the same: principally to try and seek out fascinating and important papers throughout the range of biology. Last year, 2011, was another great year for the journal. Submissions continued at a very high level and for the first time, the journal's Impact Factor went above 5, reaching 5.064.We have maintained our strength in core areas such as ecology, evolution and behaviour, while at the same time increasing the proportion of content in other areas such as environmental science and health and disease. Encouragingly, there is also now a much greater international spread of authors, with an increased proportion coming from the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia and Asia.The journal's rejection rate is now higher than ever, as we have had to become increasingly selective, and search for the most outstanding contributions. While this is a sign of ‘good health’, it is an unfortunate corollary that we increasingly have to turn away some very good papers that just fail to compete for space in the journal. Part of the attraction of the journal is the rapid turnaround times that we can achieve. This has improved during the past year with receipt to acceptance now at an average of 30 days (34 days in 2010) and receipt to online publication at an average of 63 days (66 days in 2010). As always, this is only achievable with the support of our excellent Editorial Board and the wonderful backup we all receive from the Royal Society Publishing team.There have been many research highlights appearing in the journal during the past year, and here are just a few of them. We published our first special feature, ‘Information processing in miniature brains’, guest edited by Associate Editor Lars Chittka [1], which covered a fascinating array of topics, including spatial memory, colour vision, attention, memory dynamics and sleep. Other highlights include papers such as ‘Vertical transmission of learned signatures in a wild parrot’ [2], ‘Expansion of mass-flowering crops leads to transient pollinator dilution and reduced wild plant pollination’ [3] and ‘Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words’ [4], which together capture the huge diversity of subjects that Proceedings B covers, something that our readers often compliment us on.As always, our reviews are a key and an important feature of the journal and I would like to thank our Reviews Editor, Mike Siva-Jothy, for his continued dedication. Some examples from 2011 are the recent Canadian Society for Ecology and Evolution review, ‘Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process’ [5], and the reviews by Alexander Badyaev [6], Edward Davis et al. [7] and that of Jiri Hulcr & Robert Dunn [8].Proceedings B is widely recognized for its focus on evolutionary biology, ecology and behaviour, but as always, we remain keen to attract papers of broad interest across the whole spectrum of biology. My fellow Editors and I will endeavour to ensure 2012 is an even better year for the journal and we look forward to receiving and reading your most outstanding contributions.FootnotesThis journal is © 2011 The Royal SocietyReferences1Chittka L.& Skorupski P.. 2011Information processing in miniature brains. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 885–888.doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2699 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2699). Link, ISI, Google Scholar2Berg K. S., Delgado S., Cortopassi K. A., Beissinger S. R.& Bradbury J. W.In press. Vertical transmission of learned signatures in a wild parrot. Proc. R. Soc. B.doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0932 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0932). Link, ISI, Google Scholar3Holzschuh A., Dormann C. F., Tscharntke T.& Steffan-Dewenter I.. 2011Expansion of mass-flowering crops leads to transient pollinator dilution and reduced wild plant pollination. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 3444–3451.doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0268 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0268). Link, ISI, Google Scholar4Zrenner E., et al.2011Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 1489–1497.doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1747 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1747). Link, ISI, Google Scholar5Morris D. W.. 2011Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2401–2411.doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0604 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0604). Link, ISI, Google Scholar6Badyaev A. V.. 2011Origin of the fittest: link between emergent variation and evolutionary change as a critical question in evolutionary biology. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 1921–1929.doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0548 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0548). Link, ISI, Google Scholar7Davis E. B., Brakora K. A.& Lee A. H.. 2011Evolution of ruminant headgear: a review. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2857–2865.doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0938 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0938). Link, ISI, Google Scholar8Hulcr J.& Dunn R. R.. 2011The sudden emergence of pathogenicity in insect–fungus symbioses threatens naive forest ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2866–2873.doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1130 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1130). Link, ISI, Google Scholar Next Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetails This Issue07 January 2012Volume 279Issue 1726 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.2012PubMed:22012982Published by:Royal SocietyOnline ISSN:1471-2954History: Published online19/10/2011Published in print07/01/2012 License:This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society Citations and impact Subjectsecology Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,666
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,477

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,031
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0060,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0150,006
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,6660,576

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,102
Tête enseignante GPT0,333
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences→Même sujetGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms→Travaux en français237 207→