MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2083500179 · doi:10.1080/00467600701585682

Slavery, Colonialism and the Pursuit of Community Life: Anglican Mission Education in Zanzibar and Northern Rhodesia 1864–1940

2008· article· en· W2083500179 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistory of Education · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueChristian Theology and Mission
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColonialismIndigenousEmpireMandatePower (physics)HistoryChristianitySociologyAncient historyEconomic historyPolitical scienceEthnologyLawArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Education became the central focus of the Universities' Mission to Central Africa (UMCA) following a disastrous and unsuccessful attempt to settle in Nyasaland (now Malawi). The aim of this article is to trace the UMCA educational policy from Zanzibar, where the mission became established in 1864, to Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia). From their earliest experiences in Africa UMCA missionaries were confronted with the reality and horror of slavery. In Nyasaland missionaries fought slave raiders and in Zanzibar the first UMCA schools catered entirely for ex‐slaves. This article analyses the education developed for former slaves and shows how, as the mission expanded, missionaries continued to attempt to build communities and provide what they considered to be the best spiritual and educational opportunities for indigenous populations while facing considerable external constraints, including the expectations of a colonial power. Notes 1 Central Africa, March (1911): 61. 2 Achebe, C. Things Fall Apart. London: Heinemann, 1996. 3 Ajayi, J. Mission and Empire: The Ambiguous Mandate of Bishop Crowther. Lecture, University of Cambridge, October, 1999. Available from http://www.martynmission.cam.ac.uk/CAjayilecture; INTERNET 4 Anderson‐Morshead, A. E. M. The History of the Universities' Mission to Central Africa 1859–1898. London: UMCA Press, 1955. 5 Listowel, J. The Other Livingstone. Sussex: Julian Friedmann, 1974. 6 Universities' Mission to Central Africa Annual Report. UMCA Press, 1871: 16–17. 7 Hennell, M. “The Oxford Movement.” In The History of Christianity, edited by T. Dowley. Hong Kong: Lion, 1990. 8 Anderson‐Morshead, History of the UMCA, 5. 9 Jeal, T. Livingstone. London: Pimlico, 1993. 10 Listowel, The Other Livingstone, 198. 11 Moriyama, J. “Building a Home Grown Church.” In Three Centuries of Mission: The United Society for the Propagation of the Gospel, edited by D. O'Connor. London: Continuum, 2000. 12 Tozer, W. G. 24 September 1864. In Bishop Tozer's Letters, edited by G. Ward. London: UMCA Press, 1902. 13 Tozer, 14 September 1864, Bishop Tozer's Letters, 83. 14 Anderson‐Morshead, History of the UMCA, 464. 15 Ibid., 188. 16 Tozer, 20 March 1865, Bishop Tozer's Letters, 89 17 Central Africa, April (1883), 63. 18 Anderson‐Morshead, History of the UMCA, 184–185. 19 Ibid., 465. 20 Tozer, 7 January 1865, Bishop Tozer's Letters, 103. 21 Universities' Mission to Central Africa Annual Report, 1875, 12. 22 Anderson‐Morshead, History of the UMCA, 469. 23 Tozer, 2 March 1869, Bishop Tozer's Letters, 220. 24 Wilson, G. H. The History of the Universities' Mission to Central Africa, New York: Freeport, 1935. 25 Snelson P. D. Educational Development in Northern Rhodesia 1883–1945. Ndola: Falcon Press, 1970. 26 Jeanes teachers were trained to demonstrate new methods of teaching to teachers in village schools. 27 Hine, J. E. Days Gone By. London: John Murray, 1924. 28 Ibid., 264. 29 Central Africa, January (1918): 26. 30 Central Africa, April (1910): 20. Pupils had the opportunity to become hearers if they attended school regularly, which was a sign that they were being taught about the Christian faith. 31 Ibid., 91. 32 Central Africa, October (1911): 346. 33 Wilson, The History of the Universities' Mission to Central Africa, 210. 34 Central Africa, March (1915): 291. 35 Ibid., 294. 36 Chipili Station Logbook, April, 31 (1918). In the Rhodes House Library, University of Oxford, Oxford. 37 Chipili Station Logbook, March (1919). 38 Chipili Station Annual Report (1920). In Chipili Station Logbook (1920). 39 Chipili Station Logbook (1926). 40 Chipili Station Logbook (1927). 41 Central Africa, June (1927): 124. 42 Central Africa, April (1932): 135. 43 Fiwila Station Logbook, January (1926). In Rhodes House Library, Oxford University, Oxford. 44 Ranger, T. J. Weller. Themes in the Christian History of Central Africa. Berkeley–Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1975. Ranger describes the Central African Watch Tower as a loose organisation united by the use of teachings of the International Tract and Bible Society. The message of the Watch Tower varied according to individual pastors. 45 Universities' Mission to Central Africa Annual Report, 1924. 46 Whitehead, C. “The Historiography of British Imperial Education Policy, Part 11: Africa and the Rest of the Colonial Empire.” History of Education 7, no. 4 (2005): 441–54. 47 Seghers, M. “Phelps‐Stokes in Congo: Transferring Educational Policy Discourse to Govern Metropole and Colony.” Paedagogica Historica 40, no. 4 (2004): 455–77. 48 Ragsdale, J. Protestant Mission Education in Zambia 1880–1955. London–Toronto: Associated University Press, 1986. 49 Central Africa, September (1912): 357. 50 Chipili Station Logbook, May (1919). 51 Central Africa, May (1912): 353. 52 Msoro Station Annual Report (1918). In Msoro Station Logbook (1918), Rhodes House Library, Oxford University, Oxford. 53 Chipili Station Logbook, August (1918). 54 Chipili Station Logbook, July (1918). 55 Chilikwa Station Logbook, Fort Roseberry, later Chipili, September (1916), Rhodes House Library, Oxford University, Oxford. 56 Ragsdale, Protestant Mission Education in Zambia, 80. 57 Ibid. 58 Ranger and Weller, Themes in the Christian History of Central Africa, 86. 59 Carmody, B. “The Nature and Role of Christian Conversion in Zambia.” International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 7, no. 2 (2007): 109–33. 60 Colonial Office Annual Report, No. 1292. Quoted in Snelson, Educational Development in Northern Rhodesia 1883–1945, 52. 61 Fiwila Station Logbook (1929). 62 Central Africa, January (1926): 11. 63 Central Africa, January (1934): 8. 64 Report of the General Missionary Conference of Northern Rhodesia, Kafue, 1922: 90. 65 Central Africa, April (1936): 22. 66 Central Africa, January (1936): 23. 67 Central Africa, September (1928): 198. 68 Central Africa, July (1931): 136. 69 Ibid. 70 Central Africa, July (1931): 137. 71 Central Africa, January (1931): 26. 72 Murray, V. The School in the Bush. London: Longmans, 1938. 73 Central Africa, May (1936): 93. 74 Central Africa, October (1937): 183. 75 Ibid. 76 Central Africa, April (1932): 63. 77 Ibid. 78 Central Africa, April (1936): 24. 79 Central Africa, October (1937): 206. 80 Tozer, 25 October 1871, in Bishop Tozer's Letters, 222. 81 Anderson‐Morshead, History of the Universities' Mission to Central Africa, 271. 82 See for example: Baldridge, William. “Reclaiming Our Histories.” In The Post‐Colonial Studies Reader, by B. Ashcroft. London–New York: Routledge, 2006. 83 Head, Bessie: for example, When Rain Clouds Gather. Oxford: Heinemann, 1987, and Maru. Oxford: Heineman, 1987. 84 Anderson‐Morshead, History of the Universities' Mission to Central Africa, 143.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,712
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,735

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle