MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2083933956 · doi:10.1353/aiq.2013.0015

North Country: The Making of Minnesota by Mary Lethert Wingerd (review)

2013· article· en· W2083933956 sur OpenAlex
Neil G. McKay

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Indian Quarterly · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousState (computer science)Fur tradePower (physics)HistoryCapitalismEconomic historyLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: North Country: The Making of Minnesota by Mary Lethert Wingerd Neil McKay Mary Lethert Wingerd . North Country: The Making of Minnesota. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. 248 pp. Cloth, $34.95. In North Country: The Making of Minnesota, Mary Lethert Wingerd has written a highly detailed account about how Mnisota Makoce (which in Dakota can mean "Land Where the Waters Reflect the Skies") became a territory and then a state. The format is chronological, from the early 1600s, with the fur trade, the struggle for power over the fur trade, and the struggle for territories and land. She moves on to the wars fought, including the smallpox epidemic and the coming of Christianity. From there, a large part of the book deals with how a very young United States came into power and shaped Minnesota with treaties, free market capitalism, which moved trading on the land to development and invasion, and bad Indian relations, moving on to the period just after the creation of Minnesota as a state in 1858 and going into the US-Dakota War of 1862 and its aftermath. She starts with the two first Europeans who came to the Minnesota area, Frenchmen Radisson and Groseilliers, and how they met the Dakota. From there, her detailed historical account of the fur trade both in and out of Minnesota tells the story of how the Ojibwe and Dakota would become dependent on the trading system. They would work with [End Page 278] primarily the French, British, mixed bloods, other indigenous nations, and later Americans. This makes sense, because even before the invasion of European American settlers into the area of Minnesota, the trading industry had already started to deplete resources that the Dakota and Ojibwe needed to remain as self-sustaining nations. Along with the European and European American perspectives on the fur trade, she articulates well the indigenous perspective on trading. England, France, and America tried to get indigenous people to buy into the trade as a means to become wealthy from a Western perspective. This was challenging for the European/European American mind, and they even saw it as problematic that Native people did not want to become individually wealthy: "The root of the problem . . . was the collective ethos that neither recognized private property nor rewarded accumulation of surplus" (108). Wingerd also writes: "Accumulation of goods conveyed no accompanying status. Instead individuals gained stature through generosity rather than acquisition. By material standards, chiefs were often among the poorest men in the village" (58). These differences still apply today. During the fur trade, Britain, France, and, later, a very young United States all competed and fought for land that did not belong to them. Their conduct, though, says they really did think in a manner that suggests they knew better than the Native people. The Louisiana Purchase in 1803, where the United States purchased a large chunk of land from France, is one well-known example of how two "civilized" nations conducted business in the form of a real estate transaction, disregarding the millions of Native people that already lived on the land. The power play between the United States, England, and France is not set in a positive light because of how it affected indigenous nations in present-day Canada and the United States. The perspective on indigenous people as sovereign nations that were to be respected and treated as equals and how that changed to those same nations becoming subordinate subjects/citizens, even a "problem" and obstacle to wealth and resources, started very early on and is clearly laid out. Religion is another area Wingerd details well. The Catholics had set up shop amongst the indigenous nations and traders long before any Protestants had come into the Minnesota area. The Catholics had actually worked hard to create what Wingerd calls "hybrids." Catholicism is well known for its long history in which it allows the local people [End Page 279] to blend their spiritual ways with what is Catholic, thereby creating a church that is Catholic but that the people and their ways are part of. When the Protestants arrived, they brought with them the age-old rivalry they had with the Catholics...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,306
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,006
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,190
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle