Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition
Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Résumé
Dual-process and dual-system theories in both cognitive and social psychology have been subjected to a number of recently published criticisms. However, they have been attacked as a category, incorrectly assuming there is a generic version that applies to all. We identify and respond to 5 main lines of argument made by such critics. We agree that some of these arguments have force against some of the theories in the literature but believe them to be overstated. We argue that the dual-processing distinction is supported by much recent evidence in cognitive science. Our preferred theoretical approach is one in which rapid autonomous processes (Type 1) are assumed to yield default responses unless intervened on by distinctive higher order reasoning processes (Type 2). What defines the difference is that Type 2 processing supports hypothetical thinking and load heavily on working memory.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
La notice
- Revue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Thématique
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Domaine
- Neuroscience
- Établissements canadiens
- University of Toronto
- Organismes subventionnaires
- —
- Mots-clés
- Dual (grammatical number)Dual process theory (moral psychology)CognitionProcess (computing)Argument (complex analysis)PsychologyCognitive psychologyEpistemologySocial cognitionCognitive loadProcess theoryCognitive scienceComputer scienceWork in processPhilosophyLinguistics
- Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
- oui