Seven Contemporary Plays for the Korean Diaspora in the Americas ed. by Esther Kim Lee (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Seven Contemporary Plays for the Korean Diaspora in the Americas ed. by Esther Kim Lee Kathy Foley Seven Contemporary Plays for the Korean Diaspora in the Americas. Edited and introduced by Esther Kim Lee. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012. 330pp. Esther Kim Lee, author of A History of Asian American Theatre (Cambridge University Press, 2006), continues her documentation of the drama by authors of Asian descent by editing selected plays of second-generation Koreans, largely in the United States. Thus the text is mostly about American theatre, where most of these figures have their home and locus. The work is literature-focused, and a short discussion of the literary themes is found in the introduction, [End Page 553] but very minimal attention is devoted to production or the theatre infrastructure or educational institutions that generated or supported the material. Some particulars of narrative tropes (intergenerational family issues) or, in two cases, literary references (to a pansori narrative song or the modernist Poet Yi Sang) are the Korean links. Pieces highlight child-parent and sibling conflicts that result as Confucian patterns clash with Euro-American cultural norms. Broad aspects of Korea’s history (diasporas after the devastation of the Korean War, anti-Japanese feeling stemming from the colonial occupation) form a background for a number of the plays. The work ultimately tags authors who should be watched as the contemporary American or Canadian artists they are. One of the plays has, however, had significant Korean production, Yi Sang Counts to Thirteen (see Kim Yoon Young’s 2011 review of Yi Sang Counts to Thirteen in Asian Theatre Journal 28, no. 1: 262–267). Lee does not argue any unifying factor for the plays beyond the generation of the authors (all are second generation) and their ethnicity (Korean); rather “the plays are about what the writers have felt emotionally and intuitively in seeing themselves as part of the Korea diaspora” (xxiii). Though the genres range from the surreal emotional landscape that Sung Ngo evokes in his play on poet Yi Sang to the relative realism in Julia Cho’s 99 Histories, the system the artists come from is largely East Coast American theatre education. The authors studied at Brown University (Edward Bok Lee, Sung Rno), New York University (Julia Cho, Diana Son), the New School (Lloyd Suh), or Columbia University (Kyoung Park). The one non-American-trained author is Jean Yoon (University of Toronto). This common educational training may lessen the hemispheric coverage the volume aspires toward. The two frequent themes that emerge from the overall assemblage are exploration of cultural and literary roots treated through the styles of contemporary Western dramatic arts practice and generational misunderstandings that beset the nuclear family. Kim’s introduction is brief and covers the changing dynamics of the Korean diaspora: Japanese colonialism, the devastating Korean War leading to emigration in search of economic and educational opportunity, emergence of Korea as an economic force in the 1980s and 1990s, and the hallyu (Korean wave) that has made the country a force in Asian popular culture since the 1990s. These comments and the introductions prior to each play, given their brevity, do not push toward deep analysis of the works. Editor Kim wants to hold to the idea of the authors as distinctive and different, yet has—for purposes of Korean-ness—selected plays that consciously link to either the literature of the homeland or the divides Korean upbringing may imprint on Westernized offspring. Three works adopt realism as a primary acting mode. Juliette Cho’s 99 Histories tells of a pregnant unmarried daughter who returns home to give birth and bonds with her mother as she explores the story of an aunt born with a hereditary mental disease. The Western canon is referenced repeatedly: Glass Menagerie’s “gentleman caller” and mother-child dynamic is directly [End Page 554] cited, and Ibsen’s Ghosts haunt the play with its secret of an inherited mental illness that may beset the unborn fetus. The play zigzags between realism and poetically evocative scenes. The Los Angeles riots of 1992, where the girl’s shopkeeper father died, form the background of the girl’s mental fragility. While there are...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».