MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2085065918 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2013.0041

Betwixt and Between: Mrs. Gummidge’s “Homely Rapture”

2013· article· en· W2085065918 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMigration, Policy, and Dickens Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrotherPraiseWifeRaptureArtGenealogyArt historyHistoryLiteratureSociologyTheologyPhilosophyAnthropology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Betwixt and Between:Mrs. Gummidge’s “Homely Rapture” Karen Chase (bio) Though we are now accustomed to find strife and contestation within the felicities of Dickensian domesticity, we can detect a still more sensitive register of the familial milieu by turning to characters that live as outsiders within the family. In this category, aging widows comprise an especially illuminating class: Mrs. Pipchin, Mrs. Brown, Mrs. Woodcourt, Mrs. Sparsit, Mrs. General, Mrs. Skewton, and the particular widow upon whom I will centre this analysis, Mrs. Gummidge. Such figures subtly offset the sweeter harmonies of the older men—Old Nandy or the Aged P—and let us hear a murmuring dissonance within the family circle. Mrs. Gummidge, the widow of a poor fisherman, joins the household of Daniel Peggotty, which comprises his “drowndead” brother’s child, Ham, and his “drowndead” brother-in-law’s child, “little Em’ly.” The “parents” of this household—Mrs. Gummidge and Mr. Peggotty—are unmarried, and their “children” are not of their making. We are accustomed to Dickens’s praise of reconstituted familial units, but we should be more attentive to the structural and dynamic shifts that accompany such alternatives to a bio-nuclear family structure. [End Page 68] Mr. Peggotty captures the indeterminate status of the widow when he explains to young David that the woman in question is not his wife but simply “Missis Gummidge.” Neither Miss nor Mrs., the impoverished widow has no place to occupy between the workhouse and the overturned boat that has become home to the Peggotty circle. Moreover, her signature disposition is that she misses “the old ’un,” her husband. She describes herself as “a lone lorn creetur’,” who, though not physically alone, is most definitely “lone”: she feels both lonely and isolated from family sociality (31, 36). Finally, although Dickens assigns Mrs. Gummidge no age, her domestic indeterminacy, coupled with physical indisposition and temperamental querulousness, makes her a figure of elderly provocation. Initially, David describes “a very civil woman in a white apron,” who curtseys in greeting when he and Clara Peggotty are still a quarter of a mile away. Apparently, she is an exemplary housekeeper (the interior of the boat-house “was beautifully clean … and as tidy as possible”) and a conscientious hostess (30–31). But the good that Mrs. Gummidge brings to the household is stained by her conviction that she has been singled out for special misery: “Mrs Gummidge did not always make herself so agreeable as she might have been expected to do, under the circumstances of her residence with Mr. Peggotty” (36). Her greatest provocation of others arises from the claim to feel “more” than others, and she therefore demands extra shares of comfort and acknowledgment. But suppose that what she says is true? “She was constantly complaining of the cold, and of its occasioning a visitation in her back which she called ‘the creeps’” (36). Any number of bodily conditions (including rheumatoid arthritis) may contribute to her “fretful disposition” (36). “I know what I am,” she confesses. “I know that I’m a lone lorn creetur’, and not only that everythink goes contrairy with me, but that I go contrairy with everybody” (37–38). Despite Daniel Peggotty’s generosity, manifest in the way he meets bitterness with sympathy and refuses to let such bitterness reduce him to her level, Mrs. Gummidge suffers from the egotism born of physical infirmity and social displacement. Her inability to thrive produces intolerance and critique in David, and, following his cue, impatience—perhaps even indignation—in the reader. We stand in need of correction, however. In the bio-nuclear family, the parent conventionally plays the role of instructor, but in this rougher, looser Dickensian version of the family, even the aged widow can improvise changes to her role. Initially identified as embodying a negative space in the household (not wife, not mother), Mrs. Gummidge faces the task of transforming base metal into gold—by using the energies of complaint in order to forge affirmation instead of negation. Dickens allows Mrs. Gummidge a late chance to remake herself, suggesting that a widowed old age is neither more nor less susceptible to influence than other phases in life. When...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,409
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,793

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,322
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle