MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2085525414 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2001.0020

Appearing to Diminish: Female Development and the British "Bildungsroman" 1750-1850 , and: Regulating Readers: Gender and Literary Criticism in the Eighteenth-Century Novel (review)

2001· article· en· W2085525414 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christopher Flint

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrideRomanceCriticismLiteraturePower (physics)PoliticsHistory of literatureAgency (philosophy)Literary criticismArtHistoryPhilosophyTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

598 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION 13:4 Lorna Ellis. Appearing to Diminish: Female Development and the British "Bildungsroman" 1750-1850. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press; London: Associated University Presses, 1999. 205pp. US$36.00. ISBN 0-8387-5411-2 Ellen Gardiner. Regulating Readers: Gender and Literary Criticism in the Eighteenth-Century Novel. Newark: University of Delaware Press; London: Associated University Presses, 2000. 198pp. US$36.50. ISBN 0-87413-695-4. If these two books represent general trends, they indicate a resistance to the Balkanization of male and female novel writing that has long plagued eighteenthcentury studies. In part, each book regards women's writing as engaged in an extended dialogue with men's writing, and vice versa. Indeed, Lorna Ellis and Ellen Gardiner examine female agency to show that it is understandable only in terms of complex interactions with patriarchal models of power. Appearing to Diminish traces the history ofthe female Bildungsroman as distinct from but related to the "traditional" or "male" Bildungsroman. It focuses on three kinds of texts: romance and amatory fiction, which constitute the origins of the form; near-Bildungsromane that help define the female Bildungsroman, such as The Female Quixote or Evelina; and the Bildungsroman proper, including The History ofMiss Betsy Thoughtless, Emma, Pride and Prejudice, and Jane Eyre, the "last major step" in the form (p. 138). Ellis shows that the female Bildungsroman modifies romance's treatment of female power when female characters exploit their own "looking and telling" (p. 49), and appropriates amatory fiction's more direct evocation of political and domestic power through the "overt manipulation ofthe male gaze" (p. 59). At the same time, it distances itselffrom these precursors by featuring female protagonists who covertly exercise power over courtship and marriage. The heroine's gaze manifests this play between conservative and feminist positions. Unlike heroines in romances or amatory fiction who enforce their own gazes or manipulate the gaze of others, the Bildungsroman heroine "must learn to see herself as the object of her own gaze so that she can self-consciously construct herself the way she would like to be seen" (p. 52). Detaching the female Bildungsroman from its traditional tie to romanticism and rooting it in earlier female experience and authorship, Ellis highlights the contradictions underlying eighteenth-century women's writing. The heroines oscillate between active construction and passive compromise, which suggests a resolution to the difference between those critics who regard the Bildungsroman as essentially conservative, even repressive, and those who believe it is subversive . Ellis seeks to dismantle this "false dichotomy" (p. 18) in order to generate a more complex understanding of both the genre and its historical context. The critical split thatEllis addresses is reflected in the compromises the heroines adopt. Female Bildungsroman protagonists are constrained less by artistic considerations than by the material circumstances and alienation ofwomen. Ultimately, to explain the genre's intermittent appearance and varying popularity, Ellis suggests REVIEWS 599 that Bildungsromane intensify during periods when reactionary politics follow an inconclusive social conflict such as the English social scene of the 1720s and 1730s or the French Revolution. Succinctly written, Appearing to Diminish marshals the particular features of the female Bildungsroman and effectively analyses them to show the dialectical tendencies of the form. Ellis is less successful in demonstrating how political context shapes literary production; she somewhat uncritically affirms a simple correlation between politics and literature. Apart from a few attempts to characterize various periods as revolutionary, unstable, or reactionary, she offers few details. Moreover, the tracing of recurrent Bildungsroman features in various precursors can occasionally seem schematic and repetitions. Because Ellis uses single texts as historical markers (indeed, only three authors Ellis discusses wrote Bildungsromane that satisfactorily meet her criteria), one wonders whether other less-read authors continuously produced them. Nonetheless, while Ellis offers no dramatically new analysis (Austen critics, for example, have long noted the play of subversion and conservatism in the endings to her novels), she illuminates an important critical disagreement about the female Bildungsroman, its relation to Bildunsromane generally, and its viability at different historical moments. Regulating Readers also seeks to reconstruct the writer's historical instrumentality , but situates eighteenth-century novels differently within their contemporary critical climate. Ellen Gardiner examines...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,889
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetLiterature: history, themes, analysisTravaux en français237 207