Pressure Pulsing at the Reservoir Scale: A New IOR Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Laboratory tests initiated in January 1997 demonstrated clearly that periodic, large-amplitude, low-frequency strain excitation of porous media leads to large flow enhancements. Based on these results, a new liquid flow enhancement technology for reservoirs was formulated, and a successful full-scale field experiment was executed in early 1999. Other field projects in 1999 through 2001 waterfloods in heavy oil cold production wells with sand influx confirmed the expectation that pressure pulsing, properly executed, increases oil production rate at low cost. The first trial showed that periodic application of large amplitude, liquid-phase pressure pulses increased oil production rates, decreased water-oil ratio, and increased the percentage of sand produced, even without large-scale injection. Though experience to date is in heavy oil, the process is general and will work in all porous media that have interconnected pore space. Furthermore, the method works in single-phase and two-phase liquid saturated cases, although the presence of large amounts of free gas is detrimental. Based on the field and laboratory work, and considering the nature of the physical processes, it appears likely that pressure pulsing will also help reduce coning and viscous fingering instabilities, help overcome capillary blockages, and result in more total oil recovery over time. Introduction In the oil industry, progress in production technologies is most commonly based on empirical discoveries, and only later followed by attempts to develop a consistent physical theory to explain, analyse, and predict field behaviour. This is the case for all processes, such as CHOPS (Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand), SAGD (Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage), and so on. Often, a fully rigorous physical theory remains elusive (e.g., for oil-gas-water-sand slurry flow in CHOPS production), and practice is refined through empirical models, physical reasoning and trial and error. However, the results obtained from laboratory and field research and development in pressure pulsing over the past five years were initially predicted from a new, more rigorous physical theory for porous media flow. The new theory(1) is a more complete system of equations for dynamic behaviour of interconnected multiphase porous media (matrix-liquid, including matrix-water-oil systems). It was developed by considering all relevant pore-scale physical processes (micro scale), followed by rigorous volume averaging to scale the physics up to the scale of a representative elementary volume (REV) that can statistically represent mesoscopic behaviour (cm scale). The theory is therefore consistent with the laws of thermodynamics in component phases at the pore scale, and leads to large-scale thermodynamic relationships (equations) in which porosity is found to play a fundamental thermodynamic role, similar to that of temperature in single-component systems. In other words, porosity must be treated as a basic thermodynamic variable in porous media(2). Furthermore, induced dynamic variations in porosity are responsible for the observed flow rate enhancement effect. The physical theory also dictates the experiments required to determine the parameters that arise in the equations(3). A slow dynamic wave called the porosity dilation (or porosity diffusion) wave is predicted(4).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».