A simulation System of Systems to assess military aircraft protection
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A simulation-based System of Systems (SoS), called a Virtual Proving Ground (VPG), is being developed as a comprehensive and robust approach to support aircraft protection engineering and training. For more than 20 years, laboratories and specialized equipment were developed and operated for the evaluation of aircraft self-protection. Most of these systems were originally designed on a standalone basis to answer specific questions. On the other hand, operational requests followed an ad-hoc process that did not allow traceability and knowledge management. As these systems are complementary, their integration came as a logical path to increase the capability. This paper presents an overview of the VPG SoS, including the individual systems, the common architecture framework and the services that are key to a comprehensive approach: collaborative tools and computer-assisted processes. The paper also introduces the SoS inner capability to evolve and discusses the benefits of the approach. The VPG links hardware-in-the-loop (HWIL) systems within a common virtual environment. The simulation includes not only services like time and error management, but also a robust execution engine that allows the execution of a broad variety of digital models. It was designed to facilitate reusability by flexible composition schemes and standardized interfaces. Like building blocks, the SoS allows the substitution of digital models with their HWIL counterparts. The decision to use a digital or hardware component must be based on the requirements for a specific level of fidelity or performance. The SoS extends beyond the sole integration of software and hardware systems. It also includes a set of collaborative tools with associated processes, and implements an overarching verification and validation methodology. The collaborative tools are developed to facilitate the communication and interaction, and bring a cultural change within the operational community. More than just a database or a portal, it unifies the way requests are managed by the stakeholders by clarifying the roles and responsibilities; it centralizes data from databases that were up to now located in different places; and finally, it greatly fosters knowledge management and robust problem solving within the organization.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».