MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2085925215 · doi:10.1353/scu.2000.0037

No Spark of Malice The Murder of Martin Begnaud , and: Whisper to the Black Candle Voodoo, Murder, and the Case of Anjette Lyles (review)

2000· article· en· W2085925215 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frank G Queen

Notice bibliographique

RevueSouthern cultures · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMaliceJuryVerdictWhite (mutation)LawArtHistoryArt historyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

No Spark of Malice The Murder ofMartin Begnaud By William Arceneaux Louisiana State University Press, 1999 360 pp. Cloth $34.95 Whisper to the Black Candle Voodoo, Murder, and the Case of Anjette Lyles ByJaclyn Weldon White Mercer University Press, 1999 192 pp. Cloth $22.95 Reviewed by Frank Q. Queen, a Waynesville, North Carolina, lawyer whose only criminal trial ended in a hung jury twenty-two years ago, after which he retired from trial work—undefeated. He also is die uncredited author of "A Style Manual for die North Carolina Rules ofAppellate Procedure," published by the North Carolina Bar Association, 1999. Whoever said crime doesn't pay hasn't been in a bookstore lately. By the pink you know you're in the Barbie section at Toys R Us and by the black and red covers you know you're in the bookstore crime section. But Lord, who reads this stuff? Well—right now, I do. Crime is my life. I'm a lawyer. (All right, I'm a realestate lawyer—so we don't use guns, O.K.?) In No Spark ofMalice, William Arceneaux has appropriated the true-crime form to give us a historylesson. In Whisperto theBlack Candle,]adynWeldon White provides a simple and gruesome story, fascinating in its own way. Arceneaux has the better of it, perhaps because it is his family's story. He tells of the 1896 murder of Martin Begnaud (his great-great-uncle on his mother's side) at Scott Station, Lafayette Parish, Louisiana.Just asJohn McPhee lifts a pebble and speaks of mountains, Arceneaux quickly sets the stage, produces the body—and then figuratively asks: "What is this French-speaking man, his people from cold, distant Canada, doing in this suspect terrain?" The whodunit keeps us involved as he tells the story of the settlement of French farmers in Nova Scotia, beginningin 1604. They called itAcadia, after the Greek mythological paradise. They were seeking decent farmland, and they found mosdy bad weather. Over the next hundred and fifty years the Acadians comprised a visible (but not very profitable) French outpost in the new world. Eventually their territory Reviews 77 was ceded to the English as part ofa war settlement and they became, politically at least, English subjects. In spite of their new status they retained their language and insisted that they would remain neutral in conflicts between England and France. When the French and Indian War broke out in 1754, the Acadian neutrality and stubbornness provided all the excuse the English governor needed to order the wholesale destruction of the Acadian towns, farms, and livestock. The residents were rounded up and transported, mosdy to France and England. Martin Begnaud's people were in France when Spanish land promoters came through, promising free land and better weather in Louisiana, then Spanish territory . They eventually settled—exhausted, one imagines—in the Attakapas Prairie , the cowboy country ofwest-central Louisiana. They became farmers, cattlemen and ranchers in "New Acadia." They had been living in Louisiana a hundred years when Begnaud was killed. The murder was first blamed on a local toughguy and a traveling "Italian" grifter (who was actually French). They were jailed and tortured. In spite of one having his fingernails pulled out and both being half-starved, they inconveniendy refused to admit anything. There wasn't much to connect them to it, and, as the months passed, the sheriff's investigation was going nowhere. Disgusted, the family hired a sharp young lawyer to help the authorities. He questioned the family members in detail and one recalled that a pair of teenage brothers, French farm laborers, had left town shortly after the murder. Unsuspecting , these two returned to Scott Station on their own, nine months after the murder. Within a day, the family's lawyer tricked diem bom into confessions. (The initial suspects, incidentally, were released with a warm handshake from the sheriff, though one "was never the same.") The central mystery from this point is whether the prisoners are going to see the government's hangman or be lynched in die meantime. The sheriff, a stubborn man whose intention was to have the first legal hanging in Lafayette Parish, kept getting word...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSouthern culturesMême sujetCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207