MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2085962410 · doi:10.1353/abr.2007.0126

A Rare View of Chinese Canadian History

2007· article· en· W2085962410 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allen Gee

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUtterancePoetryPower (physics)Subject (documents)LinguisticsPsychologyLiteratureHistoryPhilosophyArtComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

JÙREfiC« REVIEW Bar-Nadav continuedfrom previous page Having already been influenced by men, the speaker is at home with experiencing the world through their eyes. As a comment on lyric poetry, Robertson suggests that women poets have long been influenced or changed by male "power and domination." Ironically, this familiar territory helps to inform her project. Seemingly reenergized by this recognition, the speaker tries on a bawdy playfulness and speaks "from the juicy mouth of a man or boy devotedly saying I am, I am, and it is a song." With sexual verve, the speaker takes her place inside of men's mouths, elated by the power of poetic utterance. Men are seen as exploitable objects through which the speaker experiences amazement, "ejecting form like a gland, trashy." Although the speaker initially is entertained, she concludes that linguistic (and sexual) domination does not lead to accurate depictions of men, or, conversely, women. This insight indicates that the male subjugation of women in lyric poems only served to inscribe the men who wrote them. Likewise, the speaker may only succeed in inscribing herself. Robertson prompts us to consider what language , ifany, belongs to men, women, the speaker, or the poet. If, as the speaker claims, "The men / Flow down / The pen / And they write," is the same true for women poets? Can they bodily flow into language if that language already has been claimed by men? As her subject grows more layered and complex, the speaker finds that to "speak ofthe men is no trifle." She nevertheless faces her sizeable undertaking that newly defined includes the investigation of subject (men), self (the lyric "I"), and their representation in language. The speaker perceives language itself as insurmountably gendered: There is a physiognomy of men, an Inscription upon all his works The inscription of their several forms, constitutions, parts And operations. As a result, the speaker realizes that the very language that men have used to objectify women can no longer be used to accurately represent men either. Not seeking to assign blame, the speaker "cannot condemn the men," but neither does she "envy" nor wish to "instruct" them. Rather, she invites men to "step out" of the skewed linguistic landscape they created. Striving to achieve "literal transparency," the speaker emerges with a renewed idealism and the understanding that the "concept of the men is elastic ." Rather than categorize men or make gendered assumptions, the speaker perceives both "the men and inside them the people." An analogy is thereby drawn between language and gender: neither can accurately contain or define the person within. This premise is underscored by the speaker's assertion that "men are as mysterious as art." Inspired by Erin O'Brien and Lucy Hogg's paintings to write The Men, Robertson shows her alliance with other women artists exploring the epistemologies of their various aesthetic mediums. In museums, the "men will overflow. Red, yellow, green-silver, maroon, blue, black are the men and stuck in the streak, the twist, the line, like paint." Not only will men, like women, go to museums and observe mysterious depictions of themselves, but they also will know that people cannot wholly be contained in paint—or in language. With this premise in hand, the speaker apperceives a "seizure of language," and "the absolute strangeness of their kind" (i.e., the men). Considering Robertson's hypothesis that neither men nor women are empowered by the status quo treatment of language, "seizure" most likely indicates a striking , even violent, shift in poetics versus the forcible seizure of language from men. Wanting "simply to represent" the men, the speaker finds that the "horizon vanishes," and the lyric tradition that once seemed so fixed falls away. At last what the poet can offer is the "men from a perspective," rather than a universal inscription of all men. Men are seen as exploitable objects through which the speaker experiences amazement. As Robertson's The Men demonstrates, authentic revision of the lyric involves transcending the traditional lyric model—in which the male author objectifies the female subject—or its inversion (the female author objectifying the male subject). Robertson revitalizes the lyric by using a self-reflexive lens and problematizes...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,255
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,008
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book reviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207