MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2086010785 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0307

Ukraine: An Illustrated History (review)

2009· article· en· W2086010785 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Serhy Yekelchyk

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSoviet and Russian History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUkrainianHistoryPortraitReading (process)ClassicsArt historyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Ukraine: An Illustrated History Serhy Yekelchyk (bio) Paul Robert Magocsi. Ukraine: An Illustrated History. University of Toronto Press. x, 336. $75.00 Readers interested in Ukraine will remember nostalgically Professor Magocsi’s excellent Ukraine: A Historical Atlas, which has long been out of print. With the publication of Ukraine: An Illustrated History, those looking for historical maps of this country will finally obtain an easily available and reliable source for their genealogical or historical research. Yet this book serves a much greater audience than just enthusiasts of historical cartography. Each of the forty-six historical maps serves as the centrepiece of a short chapter discussing the relevant period of Ukrainian history. The book is also embellished with hundreds of well-chosen illustrations, from regional landscapes to historical monuments to portraits of prominent individuals. In other words, this attractive volume can serve as an introduction to Ukrainian history for the general reader. It can also be used as a textbook. In this latter capacity, the book under review is ideal for those readers who find it challenging to make it through the eight hundred pages of Magocsi’s monumental Ukraine: A History. The present volume is essentially a very good, updated distillation of the larger historical survey; most maps also originate from the same source. The shorter work lacks a bibliography or a list of recommended reading, but readers can always find these in the longer survey. Ukraine: An Illustrated History has also inherited its predecessor’s main strength when compared to other histories of Ukraine – detailed coverage of Ukraine’s national minorities. Even in the shorter work, the author provides the best treatment of the history of the Jews, Mennonites, and Crimean Tatars in what is now Ukraine. His analysis of Soviet ‘nativization’ policies during the 1920s is also much more balanced than that of other historians, who focus exclusively on the ‘Ukrainization’ component, while giving short shrift to other ethnic groups. Another notable strength of Magocsi’s work is the attention to detail in border changes. Ukraine’s western border, in particular, was altered a number of times during the turbulent twentieth century. This is the only survey of Ukrainian history that clearly guides the reader through these (and previous) territorial changes. While narrating the millennia-long history of the land, which eventually became the Ukrainian state, Magocsi never misses an opportunity to tell a good story: for example, the one about the bubonic plague entering Europe in 1341 through the port of Caffa (present-day Feodosiia) or about Ukrainians recalling the navigational skills of their itinerant salt traders by naming the Milky Way after them as Chumaks’ Road (Chumats’kyi Shliakh). The author’s interpretations of well-known historical events are also refreshing. For example, he proposes to analyze the seventeenth-century Khmelnytsky Rebellion not simply as a [End Page 188] Polish-Ukrainian confrontation but as a ‘civil conflict among the Rus (Ukrainians) themselves – couched in terms of religion and ethnicity.’ For a work covering almost two millennia in the space of three hundred pages, Magocsi’s book is remarkably error-free. I have my doubts about the positioning of Nikolai Gogol’s portrait in the section on ethnic Russians; it would probably be in its rightful place in the section on ethnic Ukrainians somewhere before the images of Taras Shevchenko and Lesia Ukrainka. Neither Pavel Postyshev nor Stanislav Kosior appears with Stalin on photo 38.9 as stated in the caption. I hope that in the next edition of this valuable text Magocsi will include a separate chapter on the 2004 Orange Revolution, possibly accompanied by a map of territorial voting patterns in that controversial presidential election. As it stands now, the Soviet collapse and the history of independent Ukraine are covered in a single chapter, and the Orange Revolution – the event which greatly increased interest in Ukraine among Western readers – gets only two short concluding paragraphs. The author, his cartographers and research assistants, and the staff at the University of Toronto Press all deserve credit for producing a very handsome volume that will surely be popular as a gift among Ukrainian Canadians. Serhy Yekelchyk Serhy Yekelchyk, Department of History, University of Victoria Copyright © 2009...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,925
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetSoviet and Russian HistoryTravaux en français237 207