MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2086632359 · doi:10.1001/jama.297.4.411

Antidepressants in Coronary Heart Disease

2007· letter· en· W2086632359 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexander H. Glassman, J. Thomas Bigger

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAMA · 2007
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac Health and Mental Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCoronary heart diseaseCardiologyCoronary diseaseInternal medicineDiseaseIntensive care medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IN THIS ISSUE OF JAMA, LESPERANCE ET AL 1 REPORT THE results of the Canadian Cardiac Randomized Evaluation of Antidepressant and Psychotherapy Efficacy (CREATE) trial, a blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial testing the efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram and interpersonal psychotherapy in 284 patients with major depressive disorder. The efficacy of citalopram and interpersonal psychotherapy in the treatment of major depression in patients primarily free of coronary heart disease (CHD) is well documented. The clinical importance of CREATE is that it involved patients with comorbid CHD. Depression is a painful, functionally impairing, and frequently recurrent condition that in patients with either coronary or cerebral vascular disease also significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. A recent report found 17 studies indicating that depression following a coronary event was associated with a 3-fold increase in cardiac mortality. Despite the ominous implications of depression occurring in patients with CHD, there is limited information to guide its treatment and questions have even been raised about whether treatment is needed. Some physicians consider major depressive disorder that is detected after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) episode as an understandable reaction to stress that will remit when the coronary condition stabilizes. However, recent studies show that most major depressive disorders observed after ACS began long before the coronary event, which therefore could not have provoked the depression. In 1993, Frasure-Smith et al first raised the question of whether treating depression after ACS would reduce cardiac morbidity and mortality. At that time, neither safety nor efficacy data were available for any antidepressant during the post-ACS period. The Sertraline Antidepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHART) tested the safety and antidepressant efficacy of sertraline in patients with ACS as a step to test mortality reduction. SADHART found no adverse cardiovascular effects associated with sertraline treatment and reported that depressive symptoms improved in patients whose depression was severe or began before the coronary event or those who had a history of prior episodes. Among patients whose depressive episode was mild or first began after their coronary event, placebo response rates were high with no significant drug-placebo difference. SADHART, with 369 patients, was not powered to determine whether sertraline reduced death or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). The Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) trial, which randomized 1834 depressed, post-MI patients, was adequately powered to test whether cognitive behavioral therapy would reduce death compared with usual care. Treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy reduced depression modestly but not death or recurrent MI. For ethical reasons, patients enrolling with more severe depression or failing to respond to cognitive behavioral therapy were offered an antidepressant drug. Approximately 20% received an SSRI, usually sertraline. Patients treated with an SSRI, whether assigned to receive cognitive behavioral therapy or usual care, had a 42% reduction in death or recurrent MI compared with the 1388 depressed patients not receiving an antidepressant. Although not based on randomized treatment, this difference was highly statistically significant. The CREATE trial documents the antidepressant efficacy of a second SSRI, citalopram, in a comorbid CHD population. Although CREATE, ENRICHD, and SADHART all enrolled patients meeting criteria for major depressive disorder, half the participants in ENRICHD and SADHART had less severe depression than that required for enrollment in CREATE. The majority of patients participating in SADHART and ENRICHD began treatment in the first month after experiencing ACS when risk of cardiovascular events is high. In contrast, patients in the CREATE trial began treatment on average more than 18 months after their index event. Despite these differences, SADHART and CREATE found similar drug-response characteristics. CREATE limited enrollment to patients with moderate to severe depression and found citalopram had a response rate of 31% greater than

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,336
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,919

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,347
Écart entre enseignants0,319 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations21
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAMAMême sujetCardiac Health and Mental HealthTravaux en français237 207