Iterative Coupling Between Geomechanical Deformation and Reservoir Flow

This article, written by Technology Editor Dennis Denney, contains highlights of paper SPE 97879, "An Overview of Iterative Coupling Between Geomechanical Deformation and Reservoir Flow," by D. Tran, SPE, L. Nghiem, SPE, and L. Buchanan, SPE, Computer Modelling Group Ltd., prepared for the 2005 SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 1–3 November. With the help of geomechanics, many physical phenomena can be explained (e.g., reservoir compaction and subsidence, casing failure, or pore collapse). Several methods for coupling geomechanics to fluid flow in the reservoir have been proposed. The iterative-coupled method has proved effective. Introduction The coupling of a reservoir simulator to a geomechanics module has wide application in petroleum production. With the aid of geomechanics, many phenomena can be explained, such as compaction, subsidence, wellbore stability, and pore collapse, as well as loss and gain in production. In a traditional reservoir simulator, subsidence can be estimated by a simple formula without knowing the geomechanical response. In some problems, such as primary production and linear materials, the subsidence computed by a reservoir simulator alone may give results that are comparable to the coupled solutions. Yet, when nonlinear materials are used, the results obtained with a conventional simulator will be much different from those obtained with a flow/geomechanics-coupled simulator. The main reason is that in a coupled simulator, the flow is affected strongly by the stress and strain through the porosity. However, in a conventional simulator, this stress dependence is ignored. Therefore, if a stress-sensitive reservoir is considered, the solution obtained from a conventional simulator cannot deliver expected results. In addition, for thermal problems, a conventional thermal simulator does not properly account for thermal stresses, the effects of which can be significant. The coupling between reservoir flow and geomechanical deformation can appear in various forms.The fully coupled approach is the tightest coupling because deformation and reservoir pressure and temperature are solved simultaneously.The iterative-coupled approach is less tight than the full-coupling method because the geomechanics calculations are performed one step after the reservoir-flow calculations.The explicit-coupled approach is considered a special case of the iterative-coupled approach. The information from a reservoir simulator is sent to a geomechanics module, but the calculations in the geomechanics module are not fed back to the reservoir simulator. Reservoir flow is not affected by the geomechanical responses calculated by the geomechanics module. The full-length paper details basic equations for reservoir flow and solid deformation to show how variables in those equations are coupled. Only the iterative-coupled approach and explicit-coupled approach are discussed. Examples related to different constitutive models such as an elastoplastic model, a plastic-cap model, and a pseudodilation/recompaction model are used to demonstrate the effects of such coupling.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.