Effect of Mixed Gas Solvent Injection on Performance of the Vapex process in an Iranian Heavy Oil Sample
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Vapor Extraction (Vapex) process is a viable and environmentally friendly alternative to currently used thermal methods. It involves injection of vaporized hydrocarbon solvents into the reservoir to decrease the heavy oil viscosity by dilution and de-asphalting. In high pressure reservoirs solvent should be accompanied by a non-condensable gas to prevent condensation by lowering the dew point of the gas mixture. This experimental work investigates the effects of mixed gas solvent injection on performance of the Vapex process in an Iranian heavy oil sample (Kuh-e-Mond reservoir) with very high viscosity and asphaltene content. The experiments were performed at low, medium and high pressure (110, 200 and 400 psig) on a 2-D visual model. Propane was injected as solvent in all of the experiments whereas methane and carbon-dioxide were applied as carrier gases. In general injecting mixed gases at high pressure caused some changes in behavior of the system which were not observed in pure solvent injection. The production rate trend showed more fluctuations; solvent chamber grew more in lateral direction rather than in depth, and less asphaltene precipitation was observed in the system. These can affect the selection of vertical spacing between well pairs and also the process application in lower permeability conditions as we may not face plugging of pores or production well due to asphaltene precipitation at lower permeabilities. In addition, the effects of solvent concentration and carrier gas type on production parameters and produced oil properties were studied. These parameters include cumulative production, production rate, recovery factor and residual oil saturation as well as density, viscosity and asphaltene content of the produced oil samples. Introduction Most of the world's oil reserves are heavy and viscous hydrocarbons which are difficult to produce. Heavy oil, extra heavy oil and bitumen make up about 70% of the world's total oil resources1. Today with global increasing demand for more oil, decline in production from conventional reservoirs and consequent increase in oil prices, heavy oil seems to be a promising resource in the future of petroleum industry. In Iran, the proved and probable heavy oil reservoirs are mostly located in southwestern part of the country. The abundance of these heavy oil deposits suggests systematic investigation of EOR techniques for future exploitation2. Very low primary recovery factors reveal the importance of applying EOR techniques to heavy oil reservoirs. Simple methods such as water flooding can not enhance the production to a desirable extend as the mobility ratio will cause early breakthrough without being able to sweep a considerable portion of the reservoir. So the main goal in designing EOR techniques for heavy oil reservoirs should be reducing the viscosity as much as possible which can be done by introducing an external agent. There are two main mechanisms in which the external agent can act to lower the viscosity, heat transfer and mass transfer. This external agent can be air, steam or solvent as in case of in-situ combustion, steam flooding/Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS)/SAGD and the Vapex process respectively.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».