Optimizing Hydraulic Fracturing Treatments for CBM Production Using Data From Post-Frac Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Commercial coal bed methane (CBM) development is currently in its infancy in Canada. Often the challenge to commercial development of this unconventional resource is to locate reservoir sweet spots and to economically optimize completion and stimulation design for coal gas extraction. Most CBM wells require hydraulic fracturing to produce at commercial gas rates. It is important to understand that fracturing of coals is very different from fracturing conventional sandstone reservoirs. Coal is a naturally fractured material (cleat system) with very unique rock mechanical properties, and is inherently prone to complex and/or multiple fractures. This may include T-shaped, ‘railroad track’, or branched fractures. This paper will present data from a regional CBM project in Alberta to illustrate the complexity and the challenges of designing fracture treatments in a tectonically active area. Regional differences in in-situ stress are shown to have a large influence on the producibility of a particular coal zone. The frac gradient information derived from the post-frac analysis can be used to locate sweet spots for piloting. Also, the same information can be used for optimizing the hydraulic fracture design and placement in the pilot project. In multiple coal zones, the indirect vertical fracture connectivity (IVFC) technique has been successfully used to reduce the probability of complex fracturing. Comparisons of this technique to the conventional completion technique will be discussed in this paper. Other key technologies in the frac design include formulation of a special nitrogen foam surfactant frac fluid that minimizes frac face damage, orientated perforations in deviated well bores that minimize complex frac geometry, and radioactive tracer logs that are used to verify and optimize frac design. Introduction While the first commercial San Juan Basin coal bed methane well was drilled in 1952(1), the commercial development of coal bed methane reservoirs in North America is a relatively recent phenomenon. The first major development period for CBM reservoirs in the US occurred during the 1984 to 1992 period and was driven by tax incentives. The next major expansion period started in 1998 to present, mainly driven by higher gas prices and improved technology to profitably develop these unconventional reservoirs. Coal reservoirs are not homogeneous and can have very different reservoir and geological characteristics, within the same general area. Many thousands of wells were drilled before the ‘Fairway’ area or sweet spot was found in the San Juan Basin Fruitland coal reservoir. Reservoir characteristics such as permeability, pressure, saturation, and gas content are all important. Geological characteristics such as coal maturity, thickness, frequency of cleating and tectonic setting also help determine the producibility of a CBM reservoir(2,3,4). Completion, stimulation and production techniques can also be very important to the commerciality of a CBM reservoir. These facts lead to the importance of proper technical analysis of the coal and the reservoir quality. This is best accomplished by drilling numerous wells over an area prior to deciding where to attempt a pilot project or commercial venture. Proper laboratory analysis of the coal properties is also extremely important, but will not be covered here.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».