Well Testing Analysis for Variable Permeability Reservoirs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Stimulation of carbonate formations by acid dissolution of the rock has been an efficient and successful method of bimproving production in oil and gas wells. Hydrochloric acid is the normal fluid of choice. However, in high temperature applications corrosion issues limit usage, especially in chrome completions. Acetic acid has been used with some success and with adequate corrosion protection. But due to its low reactivity at higher temperatures, the efficiency with which a gallon of acid dissolves the formation is perceived as low. This perception comes from reaction efficiency of acetic acid reported in the literature ranging in values from 90% at 25 °C to 40% at 121 °C for 2 to 15 wt%, respectively. Acetic acid reaction on calcium carbonate is controlled by its small dissociation constant, 1.754E-05 at 25 °C (77 °F) and therefore is labeled a weak acid. Abstract The effects of permeability variable in formation on pressure derivative curve are studied in this paper. We view the general heterogeneous reservoir as a base homogeneous reservoir modified with multiple variable permeabilities at some locations. The sections where permeabilities are different from the base permeability are called as the variable permeability sections. A heterogeneous reservoir with only one variable permeability section can be well defined as long as the permeability, the size and the location of the section are specified. Its pressure derivative deviation from that of the base homogeneous reservoir has been thoroughly studied. Results show that the start time and the value and the occurred time of maximum magnitude of the pressure derivative deviation suggest the start position, the permeability and the end position of the variable permeability section, respectively. In order to analyze a heterogeneous reservoir with multiple variable permeability sections, we proposed that its pressure derivative difference with respect to the base homogeneous reservoir is the summation of the pressure derivative differences, with respect to the base homogeneous reservoir, of the single-section multiple heterogeneous reservoirs, each of them possesses only one variable permeability section. This method has been proved and verified in the reservoirs with radial and areal permeability distribution using both analytical and numerical methods. Applications show that this method provides a useful clue for heterogeneity reservoir well testing analysis. If the test noise can be ignored in pressure derivative curve, this method is very practicable for well testing analysis of variable permeability reservoirs. In the cases where pressure noise makes the pressure derivative zigzag, some de-noising methods, for example Schroeter's deconvolution method, wavelets and optimal model, can be used to de-noise pressure data in order to get smooth pressure derivative curve. Then, this de-noised test data can be diagnosed using the method proposed. Introduction Traditional well testing analysis tends to determine an overall permeability, which cannot reflect the variation of permeability in formation. In our experiences on practical well testing interpretation, we often encounter the situations that we can match the shape and the trend of the pressure derivative curve perfectly, but we cannot match the slight waves in the pressure derivative curve. Generally there are two sources that produced these kinds of waves, pressure measurement noise and the response of heterogeneity of the reservoir. The waves generated from the pressure measurement noise are random and discontinuous, while those from the heterogeneity of the reservoir behave continuously and smoot
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».