MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2087141061 · doi:10.1176/pn.43.1.0003

Communication That Gets Results Continues to Be Our Focus

2008· article· en· W2087141061 sur OpenAlex
Carolyn Robinowitz

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNoticeMental healthAlliancePublic relationsPolitical sciencePsychologyLegislatureDistressPsychiatryLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article From the PresidentFull AccessCommunication That Gets Results Continues to Be Our FocusCarolyn Robinowitz, M.D.Carolyn Robinowitz, M.D.Published Online:4 Jan 2008https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.43.1.0003©Sylvia Johnson Photography 2007Happy New Year.It is traditional to use the end of the calendar year to sum up the previous 12 months and make New Year's resolutions. As I complete two-thirds of my presidential year, it is time to assess accomplishments and focus work for the next four months.One-year terms are brief, even with preparation in the president-elect year. Fortunately, my theme of advocacy and communication resonates with that of Nada Stotland, our presidentelect, but I recognize the limits and have emphasized ongoing capacity building and organizational performance. Consequently, I have worked internally to strengthen the function of the Board of Trustees (more about that in my next column).My focus on communication and advocacy has addressed several groups: legislators and policymakers, the media, other physicians, other health and mental health professionals, advocacy groups such as the National Alliance on Mental Illness, the business community, and the public at large, especially teachers and clergy (who often are the first to notice or be consulted about mental distress), and of course, psychiatrists—our communication with each other.Our interactions with policymakers have been full of promise, but still awaiting legislative action. The process for parity passage has been demanding, with wonderful support from some in Congress and the community, but also with many challenges posed by those who are opposed to psychiatric care. As this is being written, the decision is still pending. Please call your congressional delegation to thank members for supporting full parity and nondiscriminatory access or encouraging them to do so.In concert with other medical groups, we continue to address the potentially devastating impact of the 10 percent cut in the Medicare sustained growth rate, or SGR, and modification of the discriminatory Medicare 50 percent copay for mental illness treatment. We also have been working assiduously to protect patient privacy and to promote patient safety as well as provide care for returning military, and maintain funding of psychiatric research. Communication with legislators continues to be vital for our success.We continue to strengthen our involvement with the AMA, not only in legislative affairs, but also through psychiatrists' participation in AMA councils on medical services, science and public health, education, and long-range planning. APA member Jeremy Lazarus is the highly effective speaker of the AMA House of Delegates. The AMA has expanded its work on scope of practice, involving multiple specialty organizations, and Jay Scully, our medical director, has assumed considerable leadership in that arena. Jay is also president-elect of the Council of Medical Specialty Societies, bringing a psychiatric perspective to its deliberations.We also have engaged in some specialty-specific work to inform other physicians and improve patient care. We have completed a joint report with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on SSRIs in pregnancy, and we have initiated communication with the American Heart Association on the role of depression as a risk factor in cardiovascular disease. In addition to developing educational and clinical efforts to assist primary care physicians in recognizing and caring for people with psychiatric disorders, we are working to enhance collaboration and strengthen membership with the major psychiatric subspecialty organizationsMedia interaction continues to improve in amount and quality. Our op-ed pieces and letters to the editor have been placed in the New York Times, as well as other national and local newspapers. APA members are more frequently quoted in radio and seen on TV. Public information Web sites such as HealthyMinds.org and DepressionIsReal.org receive many visits, as does our new medication guide on ADHD prepared in collaboration with the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and available at<parentsmedguide.org>. We have expanded media training for residents, as well as on-site training for district branches.Under the aegis of our Partnership for Workplace Mental Health, funded by the American Psychiatric Foundation, I participated in the U.S.-Canadian Forum for Mental Health Productivity, informing the business community that promoting mental health in the workplace is not only the right thing to do, but is also a good business decision that positively influences productivity and the bottom line.Obviously, much more has been done and is ongoing. For 2008, we need to continue our communication and collaboration outside of our specialty. We need your involvement to educate the public and to assure access to care. At the same time, we will work internally to inform and involve our members. Please e-mail me at [email protected] with your thoughts and suggestions. I am looking forward to seeing you at our wonderful annual meeting in Washington, D.C., May 3 to 8 and to our work together in the New Year. ▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,660
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,117
Tête enseignante GPT0,433
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle