Another oral thrombin inhibitor for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia, is associated with a five-fold increase in the risk of stroke (1). Furthermore, cardio-embolic strokes in AF patients tend to be severe, and are often fatal or associated with serious morbidity. Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, produce about a 64% reduction in the risk of stroke in AF patients (2), but have numerous limitations that curtail their uptake and diminish their effectiveness. These limitations include a slow onset of action, a variable dose requirement, reflecting common genetic polymorphisms that influence their metabolism, and an unpredictable anticoagulant response because of differences in dietary vitamin K intake and numerous drug-drug interactions, which increase or decrease the anticoagulant effect (3). With the anticoagulant response so variable, routine monitoring is necessary to ensure that the international normalised ratio (INR) is therapeutic because overanticoagulation is associated with an increased risk of haemorrhage, whereas under-anticoagulation increases the risk of thrombosis. Such monitoring is inconvenient for patients and physicians and costly for the healthcare system. Because of the complexity of management, only about one-half of eligible patients with AF receive warfarin, and among those who receive such treatment, the INR is frequently outside of the therapeutic range (4). The large unmet need caused by the limitations of warfarin has prompted the development of new oral anticoagulants with potential advantages over existing agents. Ximelagatran, the first oral thrombin inhibitor, was effective for stroke prevention in patients with AF, but was withdrawn in 2006 because of potential hepatic toxicity (5). The effectiveness of ximelagatran prompted development of a second generation of oral thrombin inhibitors. The Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) trial demonstrated the effectiveness of dabigatran etexilate, the first of this new generation, for stroke prevention in AF, endorsing thrombin as an appropriate target for new anticoagulants. Two doses of dabigatran etexilate were compared with warfarin in this trial; the higher dose regimen (150 mg twice-daily) was associated with significantly fewer intracranial bleeds and strokes compared with warfarin, whereas the lower dose (110 mg twice-daily) was associated with significantly less major bleeding than warfarin and similar efficacy (6). AZD0837 is the second of the new generation of oral thrombin inhibitors. A follow-up of ximelagatran, AZD0837 is a prodrug of AR-H067637, a selective and reversible inhibitor of free and fibrin-bound thrombin (7). Cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in the liver convert AZD0837 to AR-H069927, an intermediate that undergoes further metabolism to AR-H067637, the active form. In healthy individuals, AR-H067637 has a plasma half-life of 9–14 hours and the drug is cleared in the urine and faeces. An immediate-release preparation was the first formulation of AZD0837 evaluated in clinical trials; a more recent extended-release formulation enables once-daily dosing. In this issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Olsson et al. (8) report the results of a phase II, randomised, controlled, dosefinding study evaluating the safety and tolCorrespondence to: Dr. Jeffrey Weitz Henderson Research Centre 711 Concession Street Hamilton, Ontario L8V 1C3, Canada Tel.: +1 905 574 8550, Fax: +1 905 575 2646 E-mail: jweitz@thrombosis.hhscr.org
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».