MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2087458266 · doi:10.1353/vpr.0.0114

Lost and Found: Serial Supplements in the Nineteenth Century

2010· article· en· W2087458266 sur OpenAlex
Laurel Brake

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNewspaperHistoryJournalismPoliticsPeriod (music)LiteratureMedia studiesArtLawSociologyPolitical scienceAesthetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lost and Found: Serial Supplements in the Nineteenth Century Laurel Brake (bio) This title of this paper is testimony to the elusive aspect of this form in journalism, which always articulates a reference to a prior, primary text to which it is “supplementary,” but not always preserved allied to its host. As for the primary text, its routine conditions of preservation—stripped of wrappers, adverts, and covers—mean that it is not always evident to twenty-first century readers that it was accompanied by a supplement. What Gerard Genette calls “paratextual” portions of issues1 often advertise as a feature the “generous” provision of the supplement, and may even explain its background. Recent experience with a bound copy of the Quarterly Review is thus typical: without warning from a cover or wrapper, I found references to a supplement of prints embedded in an article on illustration in this text-dominated and rarely illustrated quarterly review.2 Nor was the supplement of prints to be found in that copy. It may have been extricated by the publisher for volume publication, or by a reader for a scrapbook or framing. Supplements are frequently lost, and many, perhaps most, remain unpreserved, unrecognized, unrecorded, and uncatalogued. An example of a supplement that has recently been found is connected with the Northern Star in the same period. In frequency of publication (weekly), its type (a newspaper), and its politics (Chartist), the Northern Star could not be more different from the Quarterly Review, but both supplements consist of images, one to reward subscribers, and the other to enhance an article. Both were subsequently separated from their parent publication, but that in the Quarterly Review was probably bound into the original issue of the journal, whereas the engraved portraits attaching to the newspaper were not. Rather they were distributed to subscribers by newsagents, at different dates in different parts of the country.3 Separately preserved in an art gallery, they have only recently been identified as supplements to the newspaper, and exhibited, separately from it, 175 years [End Page 111] after their issue. Last year they were reunited with the Northern Star electronically at www.ncse.ac.uk . As these examples suggest, the term “supplement” with respect to media has a breadth of identities and meanings, with a noteworthy diversity of form, distribution, and function. I want to consider the term further and spell out aspects of this diversity. Perhaps the dominant meaning of “supplement” at present is the notion of its defining status as Extra, added value, different, and with luck, “free.” It is part of the sales discourse of circulation – of a promise of novelty, and of the “address” of serials to consumer/reader; a lure; a come-on; a bargain; but sometimes, in a sleight of hand, issues with supplements cost more. This may be seen in an early Illustrated London News, a 6d glossy weekly where “With Two Supplements” appears under the price on the masthead, which at 1/- is twice the ordinary cost.4 For the duration of the Great Exhibition in 1851, the ILN issued double numbers weekly, which also cost a shilling, and when they ended, the editor informed exhibitors that they could submit drawings of Exhibition items they wished to display (possibly for sale?), previously covered in the weekly letterpress supplement/guides, as paid advertisements, which the editor promised to publish in an advertising supplement.5 The “supplement” element of journalism then is a means whereby editors and publishers may produce odd issues of variable sizes and prices in a regular serial; it supplements inflexible elements of serial publication such as length and price that are associated with the “brand” of the title in question. Supplements allow editors and publishers to respond to events (such as war) and seasons that would warrant additional pages, for which readers or advertisers will pay, while some additional production costs such as distribution are zero.6 Profits on such supplements are likely to be higher. Supplements are thus often associated with news and topicality. The guides to the Great Exhibition that the Illustrated London News published mid-century during the Exhibition itself, for example, were issued in conjunction with its regular weekly...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,649
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,985

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle