The Ashgate Research Companion to Thomas Hardy (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Ashgate Research Companion to Thomas Hardy Juliette Berning Schaefer (bio) Rosemarie Morgan, ed., The Ashgate Research Companion to Thomas Hardy (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010), pp. xxiii + 603, $134.95 cloth. In the introduction to The Ashgate Research Companion to Thomas Hardy, Rosemarie Morgan expresses her enthusiasm for Hardy studies by stating that it is her intention as editor “to excite the reader’s sense of [End Page 496] exploration and discovery” (19). She begins by describing previous “companions” to various aspects of Hardy studies and explains that this new work “aims at a comprehensive and authoritative state-of-the-art review of current scholarship in particular areas, bringing together an international team of respected and experienced experts on the key issues in their specialties, each providing a comprehensive reference to their field” (12). Because much of Hardy’s work was published in periodicals, many of the twenty-seven chapters refer to periodicals and serialization. Of particular interest for scholars of Victorian periodicals are Charles P. C. Pettit’s “Hardy Archives,” Sophie Gilmartin’s “Hardy’s Short Stories,” and Ian Rogerson’s “Illustrating Hardy’s Novels.” In “Hardy Archives,” Pettit emphasizes the continued importance of consulting and accessing hard-copy collections of Hardy’s primary and secondary sources. He explains that there is a “large body of Hardy criticism in book and periodical form published during the nineteenth and the greater part of the twentieth century that is out of print, has not been digitized and in many cases can most conveniently be consulted in Hardy archive collections” (59). Pettit outlines the main holdings of the Dorset County Museum and Dorset Libraries, which house periodical issues and photocopies of periodical articles; Yale University’s Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, which houses the corrected proofs of the serialized version of The Hand of Ethelberta; Colby College, which houses “periodical appearances of Hardy’s poems, fiction, and non-fiction writings”; as well as general holdings related to Hardy in the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University of Texas and the New York Public Library’s Henry W. and Albert A. Berg Collection of English and American Literature. Pettit mentions, but does not devote entire sections to, the Hardy Collection at the Eton College Library and the collections on the website of the Thomas Hardy Association. After a brief description of each of the six locations, Pettit provides contact information, including addresses, emails, telephone numbers, hours, admissions requirements, and advice on how to acquire access to various documents. In “Hardy’s Short Stories,” Gilmartin analyzes the short stories, including their publication in Victorian periodicals. Hardy’s relationship with the Graphic, as well as other magazines and reviews, is addressed. Gilmartin also discusses magazine versions and reviews of various short stories. After her general introduction, she provides a section on each of the collections and pays some attention to textual studies. In “Illustrating Hardy’s Novels,” Rogerson begins by explaining that although Hardy “did not have the opportunity to establish an enduring relationship with any artist,” as did Dickens and Trollope, he “was generally well served by his illustrators and . . . seems to have been satisfied with their efforts” (428). Rogerson then describes the particulars of illustrations [End Page 497] in eleven of Hardy’s novels. He identifies other scholars who have analyzed the illustrations of various works (for example Arlene Jackson) and highlights the nature of the illustrations incorporated. Many illustrations are included in the chapter as examples, but Rogerson directs readers to the complete collection on the Thomas Hardy Association website. An appendix, “Checklist of the Illustrated Editions of Thomas Hardy’s Novels,” briefly outlines the periodical publisher and illustrator for each of the eighteen works. This book as a whole is an indispensable resource for Hardy scholars, including those interested in the serialization and periodical publication of his novels, short stories, and poetry. The extensive seventy-page bibliography is divided into seventeen sections and “stands as the most comprehensive collection of critical works on Hardy ever to appear in print within the covers of a single volume” (517). Throughout, the footnotes are detailed and useful, and there are suggestions for further study of Hardy and his works...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».