MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2087632558 · doi:10.1353/esc.2012.0027

“We call that treaty ground”: The Representation of Aboriginal Land Disputes in Wayland Drew’s Halfway Man and M.T. Kelly’s A Dream Like Mine

2012· article· en· W2087632558 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jessica Langston

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCorporationLawDreamNegotiationSociologyEconomic JusticeTreatyRepresentation (politics)Law and economicsPolitical sciencePolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

“We call that treaty ground”: The Representation of Aboriginal Land Disputes in Wayland Drew’s Halfway Man and M.T. Kelly’s A Dream Like Mine Jessica Langston (bio) In wayland drew’sHalfway Man and M. T. Kelly’s A Dream Like Mine the problems of the infringement on Native land by a white, capitalist society are explored. In Drew’s novel, Aspen Corporation wants to build a tourist resort in Neyashing, a community that is primarily composed of Anishnaabe, who are, from the perspective of government and the corporation, squatters with no actual claim to the land. In Kelly’s novel, the central land rights infringement is the Dryden Mill’s pollution of the river that runs through the Heron Portage Anishnaabe Reserve. Through their characters’ reactions to this exploitation and invasion of their space by non-Native enterprise, Drew and Kelly wrestle with the challenge of how best to talk about, understand, and productively deal with struggles over land and resources. This paper examines the solutions or non-solutions offered up by each text to the historically fraught issue of land rights. In their exploration of land disputes, these writers take up the notion of resolution through peaceable dialogue, reflecting on and troubling both the possibility of such a back and forth and the possibility of a resultant resolution. As such, these texts make an important contribution to imagining ways of negotiating justice. Their contribution rests especially in the texts’ engagement with the role of violence in land claim conflicts. While the [End Page 179] liberal humanism of our society by and large condemns violence, violence becomes complicated (or receives a complicated response) when it is in reaction to a larger systemic violence, such as the ideology of imperialism or capitalism. How, then, do we represent the violence of social protest? In particular, how does a politically conscious/conscientious white writer living in a colonial country represent the violence of an indigenous person reacting against colonial power? The value of the novels of Drew and Kelly rests in their confrontation of the topic of violence within the context of land disputes. Their value also lies in a refusal of simplistic responses to this violence; the representations of violence in both texts are ambiguous and placed within the context of the larger, systemic violence of the ongoing project of colonialism. Published in the 1980s, A Dream Like Mine in 1987 and Halfway Man in 1989, these two novels sprang from a period of growing awareness and change in terms of Canada’s relationship with its Aboriginal population. Of course, the 1980s were also a time of economic boom and development in North America. It is no surprise, then, that both texts depict an Aboriginal community facing a seemingly inevitable exploitation of their land. Aside from their common historical context, the novels are also worth comparing due to their surprisingly similar plots. The manner in which the Aboriginal characters in both texts deal with the exploitation of Native land is to take the white male, who is cast as being in a position of power in regards to the exploitative activities, on a sort of journey/quest into the wilderness that is being negatively affected by the corporations’ activities. Despite these initial commonalities, what makes such a comparison interesting is the different manner in which the two authors present the violence. While violence is present in both texts, Kelly’s novel seems to favour an unflinching depiction of violence that avoids condoning or condemning it entirely. Drew’s novel, on the other hand, does acknowledge and even contain what is cast as a kind of necessary violence, but it opts primarily to either elide the violence or simply choose an alternative path. Ultimately, A Dream Like Mine and Halfway Man warrant close readings as they take on a number of issues still highly charged today: Native land rights, violence, and the necessarily tentative position of the white writer in discussing these issues. Scholarly discussions about the representation of Aboriginal peoples in non-Native literature often posit that, as Daniel Francis puts it, “The Indian is the invention of the European” (5) or, as Terry Goldie explains, that the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,468
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,750

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,324
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsTravaux en français237 207