Peter Weiss's Fluchtpunkt, Language and the Search for Authentic Being
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The relationship between language and reality has intrigued many literati and philosophers, albeit that well into the 19th century, this relationship was still relatively unproblematic. For the enlightened thinker, mankind had access to reality through language, since the act of perception of the world, any intellectual activity, took place concomitantly with the linguistic act, i.e. in verbalizing one's perception. As Wilhelm von Humboldt's Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie show paradigmatically for 19th century German idealism, the structure of language was found to be congruent with reality, which resulted in a stable and perfect harmony between world, language, and the individual. According to Humboldt, language was an entirely logical Zwischenwelt, a mediator between individual and world whose grammatical structure shaped and organized the individual's Weltansicht (Humboldt, Schriften... 434) and to which each generation was able to contribute, for instance by way of semantic alterations and expansion of vocabulary. By the end of the 19th century, Humboldt's idealistic philosophy of language had given way to a growing Sprachskepsis—an erosion of confidence in the language-world congruence—which found early expression in the writings of German naturalist authors such as Arno Holz and Johannes Schlaf. They questioned language's ability to convey precisely and directly the minute and intricate details which naturalist writing, concerned with the painstakingly accurate depiction of the human condition, called for. Their skepticism found a forceful echo in the reflections of writers like Rainer Maria Rilke, both Heinrich and Thomas Mann, and Hugo von Hofmannsthal, whose views on language clearly showed a radical break with the notion of apriority of language in favor of a critical, skeptical, and ultimately pessimistic attitude towards the linguistic act: language was dissected, its nexus to reality scrutinized, resulting in a growing disenchantment with language as it was used, the deterioration and fossilization of words which ultimately rendered them meaningless, and the limitations that language as an historical, diachronic medium – implying semantic stability and linguistic continuity – forced upon what was increasingly
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle