Is Physical Exercise Beneficial for Persons with Parkinson's Disease?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To review existing studies evaluating the effectiveness of physical exercise on mortality, strength, balance, mobility, and activities of daily living (ADL) for sufferers of Parkinson's disease (PD). DATA SOURCES: The following databases were searched (1) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2) Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), (3) PubMed and (4) Medline/NARIC (National Rehabilitation Information Center) using combinations of key words Parkinson's disease and physical exercise. Only articles written in English were included. References cited were also examined. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were eligible if (1) only patients with PD were included in the intervention study (there were many studies that evaluated the benefits of exercise after stroke, cardiac arrest, sports injuries, surgery, and arthritis, but only a few for patients with PD), (2) the intervention included some form of physical or therapeutic exercise, (3) the effects of the physical exercise were evaluated, and (4) the studies were published in a refereed journal. Because few studies were found that dealt with PD patients exclusively, all studies that evaluated the effectiveness of physical exercise for only PD patients were included. Seven studies met our criteria and were selected. Three of the selected studies were randomized controlled studies, 1 was an open trial, and the other 3 relied on patients' own assessments. DATA SYNTHESIS: Outcomes in the studies were measured in terms of physical improvements in patients with PD, such as improved axial rotation, functional reach, flexibility, balance, muscle strength, short-step gait, and mobility. All studies reviewed show that exercise improves overall performance in PD patients. Improvements were measured using standardized tests and other measurement scales. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present research synthesis support the hypothesis that patients with PD improve their physical performance and activities of daily living through exercise. Future studies should include the development of standardized exercise programs specific for problems associated with PD as well as standardized testing methods for measuring improvements in PD patients. There is also a need for longer term studies (over 1 year) to assess if improvements achieved during the intervention stage are retained long term.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».