MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2088617953 · doi:10.1115/1.2188607

Special Issue With Contributions From ITherm 2004

2006· article· en· W2088617953 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Electronic Packaging · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHeat Transfer and Optimization
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMechanical engineeringThermal management of electronic devices and systemsPublicationElectronicsHeat transferEngineering physicsComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsPolitical scienceLawMechanics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Since its inception 20 years ago, ITherm, The Intersociety Conference on Thermal, Mechanical, and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, has been addressing recent advances in the area of thermal management, mechanical, and thermomechanical issues in electronic packages and systems. The conference has enjoyed the support of IEEE CPMT Society, which is its prime sponsor, and the ASME Heat Transfer Division's K-16 Committee on Cooling of Electronic Equipment. During these 20 years, ITherm has steadily grown and maintained a good balance of papers presented in the areas of thermal, mechanical, and emerging technologies. It has become a practice to publish selected papers from ITherm conferences in IEEE Transactions Components and Packaging Technologies. For the first time some of these papers are published in the Journal of Electronic Packaging with contributions from Thermal Management and Emerging Technologies Tracks of ITherm 2004. Of the 14 papers originally invited, 11 appear in this issue after peer review. A brief summary of these papers follows.The lead paper in this issue is a keynote paper by Goodson and Pop at ITherm 2004. In this paper, the authors have reviewed the impact of material properties and geometries on subcontinuum thermal modeling in transistor devices and examined its implications to thermal cooling of electronic systems. Ju has reported measurements of thermal resistance and a theoretical study of subcontinuum heat generation in tunnel junctions, a key element in spintronics. A nanoscale heating scheme has been proposed with implications to magnetic random access memory devices. Escobar et al. have reported an investigation into subcontinuum energy transport in crystalline and non-crystalline semiconductor materials by solving the lattice-Boltzmann equation for phonon transport using the lattice-Boltzmann method. Shojaei-Zadeh et al. have measured thermal conductivity of 100–500 μ m thick film diamond-like dielectric materials using a novel film-on-substrate technique. Gowda et al. have reported detailed failure analysis and microstructural characterization of filled thermal interface materials used between a silicon die and a heat sink/spreader. Boucher et al. have examined possible approaches for improving thermal management and energy performance of data centers with automatic control. Experimental results demonstrating implementation of modular control strategies are presented. Based on these, strategies are proposed for improving the energy efficiency of the data center while maintaining proper thermal management. Tillery et al. have discussed a method for delaying the onset of the critical heat flux whereby a vibration-induced jet is used to dislodge vapor bubbles during nucleate boiling. An experimental study, incorporating flow visualization, is used to examine the effect of this technique for maximizing surface heat fluxes in thermal test dies of fixed temperature. Rundstrom and Moshfegh have presented a steady state, 3D numerical model for the simulation of a high velocity impinging air, jet flow in combination with low velocity channel flow. The authors discuss the merits of both impingement flow and channel flow with respect to which face of the cube sees the high velocity impingement stream. Teertstra et al. have developed an analytical model for natural convection heat transfer from an isothermal single printed circuit board to its enclosure by combining the limiting cases of conduction in the enclosure, laminar, and transitional flow cases. Predictions of the analytical model favorably compare with the CFD results. Sansoucy et al. have reported experimentally measured heat transfer rates from a parallel plate heat sink under a turbulent impinging air jet for a range of Reynolds numbers and two values of nozzle-to-plate spacing. The results have also been compared with previously published numerical results. Prstic and Bar-Cohen have numerically and experimentally investigated the effect of a heat shield, a thin metal sheet placed around a partially shrouded heat sink. The results show that one can achieve heat transfer and pressure drop values with a heat shield comparable to a fully shrouded heat sink.The Executive Committee and the Organizers of past and present ITherm conferences mourn the loss of Mr. Paul A. Baltes and Prof. Gary Lehmann. These individuals have made sustained contributions to the growth and success of ITherm conferences.The Guest Editors of this Special Issue gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the following reviewers: Gamal Refai-Ahmed, Frank Andros, Mehmet Arik, Majid Bahrami, Mulugeta Berhe, Sushil H. Bhavnani, Victor Adrian Chiriac, David W. Copeland, J. Richard Culham, Timothy S. Fischer, Jen-Dong Hwang, Masaru Ishizuka, Satish G. Kandlikar, Kailash Karki, Gary Lehmann, Jennifer R. Lukes, Ravi Mahajan, Jay M. Ochterbeck, Ravi S. Prasher, K. Ramakrishna, B. G. Sammakia, Roger Schmidt, Sanjiv Sinha, S. C. Yao, and Z. W. Zhong. We acknowledge Paul Wesling, VP, Technical Publications, IEEE CPMT Society and the IEEE for granting copyright of these papers to ASME. Last, but not least, we acknowledge Gary Miller, Editorial Assistant, Journal of Electronic Packaging, for his constant help with many logistics involved in bringing out this Special Issue.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,840
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,339

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,002
Tête enseignante GPT0,190
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle