Shuttle Conveyed Open Hole Logging and its Application in Horizontal Wells
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract A novel deployment system for open hole logging tools has been developed that reduces the risk and cost of accessing high angle wells and wells with bad hole conditions. The tools are conveyed inside drill pipe where they are protected while running-in. Wireline tools are used for data quality reasons, but are modified to operate without a wireline to give speed, logistical and safety benefits relative to wireline pipe conveyed logging. Savings are also made relative to logging-while-drilling where real time formation evaluation data is not a critical requirement. The new system has been used in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin where the majority of horizontal wells have not been logged previously for reasons of accessibility, cost, and/or perceived lack of value, all of which are now addressed. In particular, the value perception has been challenged by applying formation evaluation data to issues of reservoir quality and boundary definition, confirmation of zone structure, and identification of fluid interfaces for the planning of completions and stimulations. Introduction High angle, horizontal and extended reach wells are challenging environments for the acquisition and interpretation of formation evaluation data.(1,2) The established acquisition methods are pipe conveyed logging (PCL) using conventional wireline tools, and logging while drilling (LWD) using instrumentation behind the bit. In a minority of cases, wireline tools are conveyed on coiled tubing (CT). Each method has technical and commercial weaknesses so that many horizontal wells (particularly in land locations) yield no more than a measurement-while-drilling (MWD) gamma ray. In the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, for example, we estimate that as few as 10% of horizontal wells return porosity-resistivity-acoustic data due to perceived high cost and/or because of bit size and bend radius restrictions. The challenge of interpreting log data from horizontal wells is also pertinent. The introduction of Compact open hole logging tools in 1998 was the catalyst for the development of wireless deployment techniques that address the issues of cost, operational complexity, and data quality and consistency. In the simplest of the wireless conveyance techniques - Memory Pipe Conveyed Logging (Memory PCL) - the measurement string is run in the well on the end of drill pipe. In some cases the method is used as a faster, more reliable alternative to conventional wireline PCL, while in others it is the only technical logging solution.(3) Over 80 Memory PCL jobs have been run in horizontal wells.(4) We analyzed the value contributed by the data before justifying a further development to address the issue of tool safety in uncased build sections, where tools are most vulnerable. Although memory and wireline PCL techniques both use dampers to help prevent excessive loading of the measurement string, conveyance in open build sections remained potentially hazardous. Putting the tools inside the drill pipe was the solution, and Well Shuttle was the result. DESCRIPTION OF THE LOGGING TOOLS The logging tools used in the Well Shuttle are new generation Compact format tools characterised by small size, low weight and low power consumption. They have significant advantages over conventionally-sized tools:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».