MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2089392933 · doi:10.1002/ieam.5630030301

The status of pollinators

2007· editorial· en· W2089392933 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard J. Wenning

Notice bibliographique

RevueIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management · 2007
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant and animal studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPollinationPollinatorAgricultureHoney beeForageGeographyCropFood supplyBeekeepingBiologyAgroforestryEcologyAgricultural sciencePollen

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Yet another environmental warning sign of the overwhelming influence of human activity on the global ecosystem? A mysterious phenomenon is wiping out honey bee colonies in the United States, Brazil, Canada, India, and parts of Europe. The loss of nature's best known pollinator could have a significant effect on agriculture and the food supply. In the United States, populations of the honey bee (genus Apis)— North America's most important pollinator—are in decline. According to a US Department of Agriculture census, the number of commercially managed colonies has declined from approximately 6 million in the 1940s to less than 2.4 million in 2002 (USDA 2002). During the first 6 months of this year, beekeepers became increasingly alarmed, reporting the loss of nearly one-fourth of their colonies—about 5 times the normal winter loss. According to the US Department of Agriculture, about one-third of the human diet comes from insect-pollinated plants, and the honey bee is responsible for 80% of that pollination. Honey bees play an integral role in the world food supply, and are essential for pollination worldwide of a wide range of fruits, vegetables, tree nuts, forage crops, some field crops, and other specialty crops (Johnson 2007). While not all scientists foresee a food supply crisis, noting that large-scale die-offs have happened before, the recent sharp decline in honey bee colonies seems particularly alarming. Scientists are struggling to understand what is responsible for losses of entire colonies. While the precise causes of the syndrome, generally referred to as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), remains a poorly understood phenomenon, theories include environmental change-related stresses, malnutrition, unknown pathogens (i.e., disease), mites, pesticides, genetically modified crops, beekeeping practices (such as the use of antibiotics or long-distance transportation of beehives) and electromagnetic fields emitted by cellular telephones and other manmade devices. It is unknown whether any single factor, or a combination of factors, is responsible for the sudden and near total mortality affecting colonies. Likewise, it is unclear whether CCD is a genuinely new phenomenon: Similar large-scale die-offs of honey bee populations have been reported as long ago as the late 19th century. To better understand the causes of CCD and with the hope of eventually identifying strategies to prevent further losses, university scientists, the US Department of Agriculture, agriculture and beekeeping organizations, and representatives from the departments of agriculture in New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania and West Virginia founded the CCD Working Group in the Mid-Atlantic Apiculture Research and Extension Consortium (MAAREC) based at The Pennsylvania State University. The MAAREC is a regional group focused on addressing the pest management crisis facing the beekeeping industry in the US Mid-Atlantic region. A similar mandate to understand the threat to honey bees was launched in the United Kingdom by the National Bee Unit (www.nationalbeeunit.com) acting on behalf of the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and Welsh Assembly Government. A National Research Council report released in October 2006 on the status of pollinators, and particularly the plight of honey bees, observed that among the multitude of ways humans could be harming the planet, one that has largely been ignored is the “pollinator crisis”—the perceived global decline in the number and viability of species that facilitate reproduction of flowering plants. The decline of pollinators is 1 form of global change that has a credible potential to alter the shape and structure of the terrestrial world. Only recently has the public begun to take notice and ask whether a pollinator crisis is brewing and, if so, what can be done to avert the crisis (NRC 2006). For scientists, regulatory policy makers, and environmental managers contributing to our understanding of science and its integration in environmental management and decision making, let us not forget the plight of the honey bee. Studies are urgently needed to understand the influences of chemical and nonchemical stressors on honey bees and other pollinators. Studies devoted to examination of environmental stressors and factors potentially affecting honey bees were reported at the 17th annual European meeting of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) held in Porto, Portugal, in May 2007, and pointed to the urgent need for ecotoxicology research on arthropods and assessments of alternatives to pest management methods that reduce effects on nontarget organisms. The status of pollinators is truly a global environmental issue that transcends national borders. If global climate change is our foremost pressing environmental issue, then perhaps the fate of the millions of small pollinators worldwide— which, like Earth's climate, have been taken for granted through the centuries—may well be our next most pressing environmental challenge.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,398
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,351

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIntegrated Environmental Assessment and ManagementMême sujetPlant and animal studiesTravaux en français237 207