New Butterfly Records from Guana Island, British Virgin Islands (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Guana is a small island of only 297 ha (18?28'N, 64?35,W), located on the north side of Tortola in the British Virgin Islands. Becker & S. Miller (1992) published a list of butterflies known from Guana, based on collections made between 1984 to 1990. They recorded 31 species from the small island, which is quite a high count consid ering that nearby but much larger islands have about the same recorded number (Tortola at 5444 ha has 31 species and St. Thomas at 7660 ha has 32 species; J. Miller 1994; Davies & Smith 1998). Lazell (2005) discussed the high number of but terfly species relative to the island size, and also commented that despite many entomologists vis iting Guana (including the late Robert Denno), no one had captured any new butterfly species (see also Becker & S. Miller 2002). No new species were recorded until Oct 2008 when Anaea astina (Fabricius) and Anartia jatrophae (Linnaeus) were collected by one of us (Lutman). The known food plants for both species have been found on Guana Island (Proctor in Lazell 2005), although neither species has been reared there. To test existing taxonomic concepts (Smith et al. 1994), we obtained cytochrome c oxidase I (DNA barcode) sequences from these specimens and comparative material, based on standard techniques at the University of Guelph (Craft et al. 2010; Ratnasingham & Hebert 2007). Genetic distances are expressed by Neighbor Joining with the Kimura 2 parameter as implemented in the Barcode of Life Database (Ratnasingham & He bert 2007). Voucher specimens are deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smith sonian Institution. Anartia jatrophae was predicted by Becker & Miller (1992) as a species that would eventually be found on Guana, because it occurs on the neighboring island of Tortola. In 2008, it was one of the most common species on Guana, especially on the plains around the salt pond. The DNA bar codes from Guana (Specimens USNM ENT 719001-3, Genbank HM900671-HM900673) are identical to each other, and to one of several hap lotypes from Costa Rica (Genbank GU333749), consistent with the view of this as a widespread polymorphic species (Gillham 1957; SilbergHed et al. 1980), rather than requiring recognition of the Puerto Rican Bank subspecies Anartia jatrophae semifusca Munroe (Smith et al. 1994). One Anaea astina was collected and another was observed: not as common as Anartia in 2008. The taxon astina has variously been considered a subspecies of Anaea troglodyta (Fabricius) or a species restricted to the Virgin Islands (Smith et al. 1994). The DNA barcode of the Guana speci men (USNM ENT 719004, Genbank HM900674) is 1.24-1.4% different from 3 specimens of Anaea troglodyta from the Dominican Republic (Gen bank GQ256760, and new sequences from USNM ENT 719005-6, Genbank HM900593 HM900594). The Guana sequence differs by 1 61% from a specimen published as Anaea trogl odyta from a butterfly farm with Florida origins (Genbank DQ338573, Aduse-Poku et al. 2009). These levels of genetic distance are often found within Lepidoptera species, but could also be con sistent with distinct species (Craft et al. 2010). Unfortunately, no material suitable for DNA analysis is immediately available from Puerto Rico to test the status of Anaea borquenalis as recognized by Smith et al. (1994). Further data from more localities will be necessary to fully evaluate the status of taxa in the Anaea troglo dyta complex, so for now we follow the classifica tion of Smith et al. (1994). We thank the Paul Hebert, Biodiversity Insti tute of Ontario, University of Guelph, for provid ing DNA barcodes as part of the iBOL project funded by Genome Canada, and Lauren Helgen, Smithsonian Institution, for assisting with the barcodes. This project was sponsored by The Con servation Agency through a grant from Falcon wood Foundation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle