A Nation of Counterfeiters: Capitalists, Con Men, and the Making of the United States , and: The Exchange Artist: A Tale of High-Flying Speculation and America’s First Banking Collapse (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: A Nation of Counterfeiters: Capitalists, Con Men, and the Making of the United States, and: The Exchange Artist: A Tale of High-Flying Speculation and America’s First Banking Collapse Cathy Matson (bio) A Nation of Counterfeiters: Capitalists, Con Men, and the Making of the United States. By Stephen Mihm. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007. Pp. 457. Cloth, $29.95.) The Exchange Artist: A Tale of High-Flying Speculation and America’s First Banking Collapse. By Jane Kamensky. (New York: Viking Press, 2008. Pp. xvii. 442. Cloth, $29.95.) Our picture of the early republic’s economic culture customarily features elements of a nation in the making: a unifying print culture and buoyant participatory polity, an elite willing to advocate an opportunistic economy, revived and expanding foreign trade, and a national government that promoted internal development and financial innovation. Stephen Mihm and Jane Kamensky join a group of more skeptical scholars who insist that we see a more contested, fragile economic culture. In these [End Page 364] riveting studies, counterfeiting and wild paper speculation defined the identities of certain Americans, and these people helped define the outer limits of what kind of economic culture would be possible and tolerated. There were few obstacles in early America, once the strictures of oldstyle republican virtue and imperial political authority gave way to the emergence of a raucous era in which greed and deception bubbled up regularly from the soup of widespread entrepreneurial ambition. Both studies also keenly appreciate not only how illicit and deceptive economies worked in the early republic, but also how Americans created a culture that praised risk-taking and was reluctant to condemn its greatest economic outlaws. In Mihm’s account, the illegality of counterfeiting was outweighed by Americans’ boundless entrepreneurial energies and constant shortage of specie. Given the country’s weak institutional authority and the colonial legacy of provincially issued paper money, the latter of which Mihm addresses only briefly, Americans of the early republic granted papermoney- making authority to a burgeoning number of private banks that had been chartered by states. Although most of these banks had minimal assets on hand to back up their loans, governments gave them full privileges to print notes with impunity and make sketchy promises about their future redemption. In short order, the flood of paper money washed beyond the walls of banks; improvement companies, insurance firms, mechanics’ associations, and all manner of entrepreneurs printed a mind-boggling variety of currency denominations in colors and designs that baffled credit-hungry Americans. Among the practitioners of this money-making craft in post-Revolutionary America was an underworld of counterfeiters. One of Mihm’s most important contributions in this deftly told story is his portrait of the blurred territory—ideologically and in practice— separating legitimate banking and forbidden counterfeiting. In the early republic’s Janus-faced currency economy, legitimately chartered private banks issued mountains of paper money without providing adequate sinking funds, while floods of counterfeit paper money entered mainstream circulation, where many Americans happily fueled their entrepreneurial energies with the fake notes. Both kinds of currency rested on lies about how value is created and relied on a confidence game of extraordinary proportions. Yet despite many bank failures, periodic financial panics, and destroyed reputations of borrowers and lenders alike, [End Page 365] private bank notes and counterfeit paper mingled in the pockets of countless Americans for decades. Counterfeiters, of course, had no need for sinking funds or bank buildings. In Mihm’s fascinating narrative, we see sophisticated criminal networks of engravers, printers, distributors, and “shovers” who hid out in Canada or on the fringes of early national settlements, then trekked with migrants into the Ohio Valley during the 1820s and soon infiltrated eastern cities. Stealing the names of defunct private banks, or fabricating a plausible-sounding bank name to print on their fake money, counterfeiters flourished in their nests of illicit activity until private vigilantes hired by conservative bankers hunted them down. Mihm skillfully sets the counterfeiting narrative alongside familiar larger ones about political economy and political culture, with the result of putting new twists on old arguments. For example, Mihm convinces us that in the titanic clash over the...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».