MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2089780131 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2009.0009

In "the Sumptuous Rank of the Signifier": The Gendered Tattoo in Mr. Meeson's Will

2009· article· en· W2089780131 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patricia Murphy

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArtLiteratureReading (process)TerminologyNew WomanArt historyPhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In "the Sumptuous Rank of the Signifier":The Gendered Tattoo in Mr. Meeson's Will Patricia Murphy (bio) In an 1888 Fortnightly Review essay ominously titled "The Fall of Fiction," an anonymous critic complained that H. Rider Haggard's recent "minor" novels "raise alternately the eyebrows and the gorge of his readers" (335).1 Uttering a similar sentiment, the Boston Literary World contended that "delicacy is something we have no right to expect from Mr. Haggard," yet the reviewer cited the novelist's latest offering, Mr. Meeson's Will, as evidence that when the writer "gets away from the raw beef and bloody bones business, Mr. Rider Haggard is actually capable of an amusing story" (275). The novel did garner a more positive reading from the Athenaeum, which announced that the tale is "told with a vigour" and, "as a mere story[, was] excellent," despite Haggard's "noble disregard of accuracy in details" (660). The remarkable point about the reviews of the novel is that none of them gave more than a passing reference to the novel's astonishing definitive episode, the tattooing of a will on a woman's body to convert her into a legal document. Indeed, only the Dublin Review made note of the event, dismissing it as a "somewhat bizarre incident (175)."2 Yet the strange occurrence initiates compelling hermeneutic trajectories that offer unsettling insights into the gender inflections of this 1888 novel. The tattoo inhabits "the sumptuous rank of the signifier," to borrow Roland Barthes's terminology (65), in its multiple permutations that reinforce Victorian perceptions of male superiority. Through a complex web of linkages, the tattoo marginalizes, controls, and punishes the novel's main character, a successful woman writer, for appropriating male privilege; by this means, the narrative seeks to bind her to the conventional association of femininity with the body rather than the mind. Language becomes not a tool under her control, but a weapon wielded against her. In this essay, I examine three key paths emanating from the pivotal tattooing incident to explore its gender implications. First, I contextualize the tattoo within its cultural framework, investigating connections to empire and otherness, along with vague hints of unlawful and dangerous behavior. Second, I examine the ways in which the tattoo acts as a means of control over the transgressive quasi-heroine, evaluating the tattoo as a marker of both sexuality and desexualization, as well as literal and figurative evidence of female commodification. Third, I explore the tattoo's gendered relationship to the processes [End Page 229] of cultural inscription. My objective here is not to provide an exhaustive analysis of the Victorian tattoo but to examine the multifarious ramifications of one such manifestation, the utterly intriguing one offered by Mr. Meeson's Will. Before proceeding to this analysis, though, it is necessary to address the narrative's assumption that the central figure indeed requires control. Mr. Meeson's Will follows the travails of Augusta Smithers, who is a paradoxically simplistic and complex character in that she embodies elements of both the conventional woman and the threatening New Woman.3 On first regard, Augusta seems to conform to the paradigmatic Victorian heroine through both physical attributes and personality traits. The "exceedingly pretty" (69) Augusta is a "well-formed young lady of about twenty-four" who boasts "pretty golden hair, deep grey eyes, a fine forehead, and a delicate mouth" (5). With her "sweet face" (257), Augusta acts traditionally through her maidenly blushes, determined modesty, tearful response to tribulation, and humble self-effacement designated by such remarks as "I am very silly" (13). "A good and religious girl" (142), Augusta is portrayed approvingly as a woman with a highly developed sense of duty who puts the interests of others above her own and even "rejoice[s]" at the chance of sacrifice (128). Indeed, that sacrificial tendency leads her to undertake the painful tattooing that is so crucial to the novel, and the term "sacrifice" and its variants are repeatedly invoked in describing the episode. Even the protagonist of Augusta's novel Jemima's Vow seems to have a sacrificial nature, as she dies at the end of the narrative happy that "she had now kept...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,006
Communication savante0,0050,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetLiterature: history, themes, analysisTravaux en français237 207