MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2089780167 · doi:10.1353/esc.2007.0101

Imperial Bibles, Domestic Bodies: Women, Sexuality, and Religion in the Victorian Market (review)

2006· article· en· W2089780167 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joy Dixon

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHuman sexualitySubject (documents)HistoryRelation (database)LiteratureArtSociologyGender studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Imperial Bibles, Domestic Bodies: Women, Sexuality, and Religion in the Victorian Market Joy Dixon Mary Wilson Carpenter. Imperial Bibles, Domestic Bodies: Women, Sexuality, and Religion in the Victorian Market. Athens, Ohio: Ohio UP, 2003. xxii + 206 pp. ISBN: 0-8214-1515-8. $39.95 US. The Victorian "Family Bible with Notes" was, according to Mary Wilson Carpenter, a "uniquely British institution," first prompted by restrictions on the printing of the Bible in Britain and its colonies. From the early eighteenth to the late nineteenth century the publication of Bibles with notes and commentary allowed printers to avoid restrictions on the printing of the King James or Authorized Version. Printers added engravings and illustrations and sold these Bibles in inexpensive serial editions which, Carpenter argues, are "an important resource for learning how British families read their bibles, or how their bibles read them, interpellating them as certain kinds of 'authorized version' subjects" (xv-xvi). Carpenter traces three phases in the development of the family Bible. The earliest family Bibles—which appeared in the first half of the eighteenth century—promoted themselves as a source of "universal knowledge," providing notes and commentary that attempted to make the whole contents of the Bible (including the story of Sodom and Gomorrah and other [End Page 203] similar passages) accessible and intelligible to all members of the family. As Carpenter puts it, "Commentary on what is marginalized in relation to the 'family' … suggests that the homosexual subject was even better known than studies of molly houses have proposed." Texts such as The Compleat History of the Old and New Testament; or, A Family Bible, with … annotations, extracted from the writings of the most celebrated authors (first published in 1735) not only provided frank discussions of sodomy and effeminacy but also exhibited a fascination with transgressive and undomesticated womanhood that would have been remarkable even in secular publications of the time (17, 20–21). By the early nineteenth century, however, some parts of the Bible came to be considered as unsuitable for family reading. Certain passages were bracketed off or printed in smaller type, with the instruction that they were "To be omitted from family reading." Biblical knowledge was divided between that which was appropriate for the family and that which was to be confined to the "closet," or study by the head of the household: "These Family Bibles market access to the power of secret knowledge, to be the exclusive possession of a privileged family member, typically specified as the 'Master of the family'" (xx, 8). As the century progressed, however, British Family Bibles demonstrate[d] more and more consciousness of feminine tastes: the frontispieces of patriarchal figures so common in eighteenth century bibles—the "author" of the bible, Moses with the tablets of the Law, or Jesus as princely dispenser of mercy—are replaced by representations of Moses as a baby, far too chubby to float in his wicker basket, or the boy Samuel kneeling in his little nightshirt to say his prayers. (56) Drawing on well over a hundred examples of family Bibles, spanning the period from 1690 to 1886, Carpenter begins to develop a number of suggestive arguments. In addition to her exploration of gender and sexuality she also (as the book's title suggests) places these Bibles in an "imperial" context. One important result of the "bracketing" or "closeting" of certain passages was to mark out much of the sexually explicit material (such as the stories of Sodom or Onan, or Levitical texts on bodily practices) as matters "peculiar to the Jews," so that the figure of the Jew came to represent "'unnatural' sex" (34–38, 44). In this way, Carpenter argues, "the pathologization of sexuality was intimately linked with the production of a sense of national and imperial identity" (37). [End Page 204] The second half of the book re-reads well-known Victorian women's writings in the context created by the circulation of these "Family Bibles with Notes and Commentary." So, for example, Carpenter devotes one chapter to a discussion of the biblical discourse on menstruation as it appears in Charlotte Brontë's Villette and another to an exploration of the theme of (female) circumcision in...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,046

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,305
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in Canada→Même sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→Travaux en français237 207→