Religion and Film: Cinema and the Re-Creation of the World (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Religion and Film: Cinema and the Re-Creation of the World Melissa S. Conroy S. Brent Plate . Religion and Film: Cinema and the Re-Creation of the World. New York: Wallflower Press, 2008. 112 pp. $22.00 (US). ISBN: 978-1-90564-69-5 In the preface to Religion and Film: Cinema and the Re-Creation of the World, S. Brent Plate makes clear what this book is not. It is not a book about seeing religious images or tropes in film. Nor is it a book about theologies implicit in cinema. Instead, this short, provocative book makes the claim to study both religion and film as ways of seeing that can be read as "world-making" (viii). Instead of looking at religion in film, Plate compares religion and film. He shows how both cinema and religious ritual frame the world by selecting and ordering the cosmos thereby instructing the viewer how to see time and space. Plate accurately situates his recent work in the context of three waves of scholarship on religion and film. The first wave concentrated on analyses of serious art-house cinema while the second wave turned to popular Hollywood cinema. Both of these waves structured their approaches in terms of the verbal narrative of films. The third wave, to which this book belongs, turned away from narrative approaches to film and instead moved to looking at film through the lens of film criticism and theory. Scholars of the third wave are invested in understanding the medium of film; in other words, they look to understand films as films, rather than as vehicles for narrative messages. Because it is a book not centred on reading specific narratives, Plate is able to draw upon a variety of films (of various genres and time periods) in order to engage the reader in understanding film form. The first half of his book is concerned with the formal elements of film. By aligning film and religion, Plate seeks to address "the ways myths and rituals might be seen by way of cinematography, editing, and mise-en-scène" (ix). This approach is illustrated by Plate's treatment of the opening sequences of two very different films: George Lucas's 1970s classic Stars Wars and Ron Fricke's non-narrative experimental film Baraka. In both cases, Plate pays close attention to the opening of the films, examining how the director creates a cosmogony by selecting what the viewer sees and hears. Plate's analysis begins with a narrative reading of the Star Wars. Star Wars, like Genesis, opens with a move to mythological time. The prologue starts with the phrase, "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away," which is reminiscent of Genesis 1.1: "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." But it is in Plate's analysis of the sequence of images that we really see the usefulness of reading film in a non-narrative way. The opening shots of both Baraka and Star Wars start by having the viewer see and hear the serenity of the cosmos. For example, after the prologue of Star Wars, Plate notes that the music dwindles to a lone flute. The viewer is left with the vastness of space before the camera tilts downwards to reveal a starship battle. Likewise, Plate notes that the opening shots of Baraka show the still mountains of the Himalayas before cutting to a Japanese snow monkey sitting in a hot spring, seemingly contemplating the universe. Plate skilfully shows that both of these sequences operate much like myth by suturing (through editing) the heavens and earth, or the Himalayas with the mountains of Japan. By comparing these visual cosmogonies with creation myths that move from order to chaos, Plate [End Page 330] convincingly shows that by going beyond narrative and examining the elements of film, in sight and sound, films are a visual mythology. The second half of Plate's book turns to the ways films connect with viewers materially. Here Plate turns his attention to such topics as the ritual performances that accompany the showings of the cult classic Rocky Horror Picture Show and the ways people have used...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».