MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2089952864 · doi:10.1176/pn.42.20.0017

Can Heavier Babies Expect Better Mental Health?

2007· article· en· W2089952864 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joan Arehart-Treichel

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBirth, Development, and Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnxietyDepression (economics)Mental healthLow birth weightPsychiatryBirth weightPsychologyMedicinePregnancy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & Research NewsFull AccessCan Heavier Babies Expect Better Mental Health?Joan Arehart-TreichelJoan Arehart-TreichelPublished Online:19 Oct 2007https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.42.20.0017Fetuses that experience a favorable sojourn in the womb may be better protected against anxiety and depression later in life, a study in press with Biological Psychiatry suggests.The study was conducted by Ian Colman, Ph.D., of the University of Albert School of Public Health in Edmonton, Canada, along with colleagues at the University of Cambridge and University College London in England.A wealth of data links schizophrenia to unfavorable conditions in the womb, Colman and his colleagues noted. For example, low birth weight, as a proxy for prenatal damage, as well as more direct insults such as obstetric complications, have been shown to increase the likelihood of schizophrenia. So the investigators wanted to find out whether two indicators of an adverse womb environment—low birth weight and slow motor development after birth—might be linked with an increased risk of anxiety and depression later in life.Some 4,600 persons born in the United Kingdom in 1946 and representative of all native-born adults currently residing there served as subjects. These individuals were evaluated not only for birth weight, early motor development, and early speech development, but were also assessed five times between the ages of 13 and 53 for symptoms of anxiety and depression.The anxiety and depression evaluations at ages 13 and 15 were made by the subjects' teachers. The teachers rated the subjects as more than, the same as, or less than classmates on the following 11 attitudes or behaviors reflecting anxiety, depression, and internalizing emotions and behaviors: timid child, rather frightened of rough games, extremely fearful, always tired and washed out, usually gloomy and sad, avoids attention, very anxious, unable to make friends, diffident about competing, frequently daydreams in class, and unduly miserable or worried in response to criticism.The anxiety and depression evaluation at age 36 was made by trained research nurses using a short version of the Present State Examination, a clinically validated interview, to evaluate the frequency and severity of neurotic and affective symptoms during the preceding month.At age 43, the subjects used the Psychiatric Symptom Frequency Scale, a self-administered yardstick, to rate themselves on the frequency and intensity of common symptoms of anxiety and depression during the preceding year.Then at age 53, they completed the 28-item General Health Questionnaire, which focuses on the experience and impact of anxiety and depression symptoms during the previous month.Six Patterns IdentifiedColman and his colleagues then grouped the subjects based on anxiety and depression results into six longitudinal patterns. The largest group—45 percent of the sample—had few or no symptoms. The second group—34 percent—had repeated minor or moderate symptoms that were generally below the threshold for mental illness. The third group—11 percent—had few symptoms in adolescence, but had minor or moderate symptoms in adulthood. The fourth group—6 percent—had symptoms in adolescence but was mentally well in adulthood. The fifth group—3 percent—had few symptoms in adolescence, but had severe symptoms in adulthood. Finally, the sixth and smallest group — 2 percent—had enduring high scores indicating persistent or repeated severe symptoms as teens and adults.The researchers then looked for differences among the groups on birth weight, early motor development, or early speech development, taking factors that might skew results, such as gender, social circumstances in childhood, and stressful life events in childhood, into consideration.Average Birth Weights VariedAverage birth weights differed significantly among the six groups. Most notably, the group with few or no anxiety and depressive symptoms throughout the 40-year study period had the highest average birth weight (3.44 kilograms, or 7.75 pounds), whereas the group that had repeated severe anxiety and depressive symptoms had the lowest average birth weight (3.32 kilograms or 7.25 pounds).Furthermore, early motor development differed significantly among the groups. Those with few or no anxiety and depressive symptoms were, on average, the first to stand and walk—they started walking, on average, at 13.4 months—while those with repeated severe symptoms were the last to stand and walk—they started walking, on average, at 14.4 months.The six groups did not differ significantly on the age at which they began speaking.Thus, low birth weight and slow motor development may be harbingers of later susceptibility to anxiety and depression, while robust birth weight and rapid motor development may signal some protection against anxiety and depression.But only to a point, it seems. Although the researchers found that a birth weight up to 4.5 kilograms (10 pounds) was associated with less anxiety and depression later in life, they also found that beyond that birth weight, the relationship reversed—very large babies were in fact more likely to have depression and anxiety later.How birth weight and early motor development might influence later susceptibility to anxiety and depression is not known. But Colman and his team suspect that a less-than-favorable womb environment might alter a fetus's neurodevelopment and stress response, and these alterations in turn might set it up for "poor mental health across the life course."The study was funded by the Institute for Social Studies in Medical Care, U.K. Medical Research Council, Stanley Medical Research Institute, Leverhulme Foundation, Isaac Newton Trust, and U.K. Department of Health.An abstract of "A Longitudinal Typology of Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Over the Life Course" is posted at<www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/bps/article/PIIS0006322307004362>.▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,184
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,717

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,318
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetBirth, Development, and HealthTravaux en français237 207