MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2089953280 · doi:10.1097/00006324-200207000-00005

Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision, 2nd Ed.

2002· article· en· W2089953280 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOptometry and Vision Science · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueOptics and Image Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColor visionSection (typography)Color Vision DefectsColour VisionPerceptionPsychologyArtificial intelligenceOptometryMedicineComputer scienceNeuroscience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision, 2nd Ed. Jennifer Birch. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001. Pages: 160. Price: $55.00. ISBN 0-7506-4174-6. Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision is intended to be a practical guide for testing and managing patients with color vision defects. The book contains 11 chapters that cover five major areas. The first three chapters provide a basic understanding of normal color perception, so that the reader can gain a reasonable appreciation of the differences between color-normal and color-defective individuals. The next section of the book covers basic definitions and characteristics of congenital color vision defects, including the genetics. The third section is the heart of the book. In these chapters, Professor Birch describes specific color vision tests and their design and clinical use for both children and adults. She also overviews several cases and provides templates for reports to teachers, parents, and other health care providers. The fourth section is a slight detour from congenital color vision defects. This section overviews the more common acquired color vision deficiencies and their appropriate testing strategies. The final section of the book returns to the subject of congenital color vision deficiencies, with discussions on occupational concerns and color vision defects and the use of colored filters as an aid to improve color discrimination. The content of this book lives up to its title. This is a text that is primarily devoted to testing and management issues. The chapters on basic color science and characteristics of defective color vision defects are not intended to be an in-depth discussion, but they do provide an adequate foundation for clinicians and students. The section on the genetics of color vision deficiencies is updated from the book’s first edition, reflecting the extensive work that has taken place in molecular genetics over the past decade. Again, the text provides an adequate overview of the current genetic theories. The remaining sections on testing and management offer a more extensive review of these topics, reflecting Professor Birch’s extensive experience in the area. As much as possible, she has tried to confine her review to tests that are available worldwide. This section of the book has also been updated to include more recent studies and newer tests. The one topic that is missing from it, however, is a discussion of the genetic tests for color vision defects that are being developed. Although the reader might be slightly disappointed that the cases presented at the end of Chapter 7 were not discussed in more detail, the outline of the findings and reports do provide useful models for test strategies and counseling. The chapter on acquired color vision defects is an efficient resource for clinicians because it discusses only the more common defects encountered in practice. The last two chapters on filter aids for color vision defects and occupational standards issues contain major revisions, due to the recent resurgence of color filters as an aid and the antidiscrimination challenges raised by individuals with color vision defects. Although Professor Birch describes color vision standards from throughout the world, her emphasis is on standards found in the United Kingdom. These chapters are important reminders to the reader that management of color vision defects is more than just informing the person that they have a problem. There a few editorial errors that distract from the book’s overall quality. One of the more obvious examples was Professor Birch’s statement that rods have the greatest density 5° from the fovea. Another error was her suggestion that I have evaluated color-filter aids in my work using the Hardy-Rand-Ritter plates when the tests actually involved the Standard Pseudoisochromatic Plates, Parts 1 and 2. There is a substantial amount of new information in this second edition of Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision; therefore, if you have the first edition and still refer to it, you should consider updating your library. If do not have the first edition and you are thinking about purchasing the second edition, it is important to remember that this book is a practical clinical guide for managing the color-defective patient. As such, it has little value to the researcher who is interested in normal and abnormal color perception. Regardless, this would be a very useful book for optometry students and for clinicians who wish to have a current overview of the area and practical reference in their library.FIGUREFigure

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,206
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,875

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,332 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle