DEVELOPMENT OF AN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT The effectiveness of spill response organizations to handle incidents much depends on the use of well trained personnel and specialized equipment. Knowing where equipment is located, and ensuring that it is ready to use and in good working order are both vital to the planning and management of a response. It is with these goals and concerns that the Eastern Canada Response Corporation (ECRC) recently decided to update its computerized equipment inventory and maintenance system. An analysis showed that commercially equipment maintenance support systems were not well adapted to the general maintenance processes and tasks used within the organization, were too complex and were not flexible enough. For this reason, an entirely new system was created to support the management of equipment maintenance. The system was developed using Microsoft Access, with a file server architecture allowing many users to access each of 6 regionally maintained equipment databases. A simple internet based mechanism was developed to enable merging of each of the database for consultation for inventory purposes. Some of the functions included:– Support for the planning of each of 4 types of maintenance, including preventive, license renewal, safety inspections and enhancements or repairs;– A simple mechanism allowing the user to indicate that a piece of equipment is located within another piece of equipment.– The capacity to associate lists of accessories to pieces of equipment– Storage and retrieval of predefined maintenance processes description Support was also provided to the planning of equipment repair or enhancements through the production of itemized and dated tasks lists. Some other additional features included: the management of equipment names, to prevent proliferation of names for essentially similar pieces of equipment; the inclusion of a “query-by-example” mechanism for equipment search; and the capacity to export any or all data to a spreadsheet, in order to enable flexible analysis and planning. The system was also designed in a way to make it easy to upgrade to a database server architecture, should the need arise. The approach used for the system development and implementation would be applicable to any small to medium size response organization.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».