Energy's Struggle with Rapidly Changing Roles, Responsibilities, and Reputation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Guest editorial Almost every aspect of modern society is supported or influenced by energy—and yet it is one of the least understood and possibly one of the most reviled industries on the planet. Whether we like it or not, the energy sector’s public image has been shaped over the past couple of generations to be synonymous with corporate profiteering, environmental disregard, and social abstinence. It is hard for those of us who work in this industry to rationalize such a reputation when we know that our collective programs on safety, the environment, corporate social responsibility, and technology innovation are among the best to be found in any sector. This is the energy paradox, and in the face of an ever-growing and daunting demand for energy, it is apparent that the industry’s relationship with society has to change. But is it one that we can tackle on our own? Changes at Scale Nowhere is the energy paradox more evident than with the shale revolution in the United States. In just a few years, the industry has moved from initial experimentation to drilling almost 40,000 wells per year—changing employment and prosperity in many parts of the country, creating the potential for energy independence, and disrupting long-standing equilibria in the geopolitical landscape. In addition to this direct impact, the promise of sustained, accessible, and affordable energy is becoming a powerful economic multiplier, with an increasing number of new manufacturing plants replacing coal with natural gas, resulting in a marked impact on the reduction of carbon emissions. The sheer scale of this activity, though, is stressing domestic infrastructure beyond design, overloading pipelines, roadways, and rail networks. More and more, these activities are expanding into private land and creating new engagements among companies that represent our industry and stakeholders in communities, local governments, and states. It remains to be seen to what degree these constituents are willing to deal with what is, in effect, the reindustrialization of the United States when it is in their own backyards. Energy as a Foreign Language We do have some strong indications that people are taking notice. Shale development today dominates the conversations and activities of a myriad of special interest groups, trade organizations, and government and community initiatives as well as industry forums. However, with more than 10,000 E&P companies working in this space in the United States alone, all of these activities, while important in their own right, are extremely fragmented and very few represent more than a few stakeholders. It is at the interfaces among all these groups that the energy paradox is most obvious. The industry, mostly well intentioned, has typically developed messages that are too often meant to “teach” other groups about the “facts” of shale development. But these messages can be perceived as arrogant, condescending, and uncaring by stakeholders who have other, just as well-intentioned, viewpoints.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».